<<Disclaimer: Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>> I don't think we ought to condemn the Rice Dream people too hard. OK, maybe they were slow to respond, but they did. How many other companies have taken the question nearly as seriously? Probably not that many. How are we to get them to take that last 5 mg seriously if the medical establishment won't come out definitively on it? I think we should thank them for the detailed and personal responses, and for getting their technical people to focus on the question rather than just responding legalisticly. How many other companies are stepping forward to add the label caution? Personally, I think my feelings of disappointment with them have to do with how much I like the stuff (love it) and wish I could drink it. I do react to it, so that is out of the question. I was far more disappointed to have to give up rice dream than any bread product. I would caution people to study the question, think hard and use their own judgement before accepting the idea that there is a "safe" level of gluten exposure. The medical state of the art on celiac is pretty primitive. (Witness the continued survival of the barbaric "gluten challenge".) How can they say there is an increased risk of lymphoma (presumably from chronic challenge to the immune system) and also say there is a "safe" level of exposure? I personally consider this illogical and don't plan to risk my health on it.