Andrew Brook, on or about 01/23/97, wrote:
>A couple of points in response to Eric's last post:
>
>1. The analytic community did not criticize Masson at the stage at which
>he was still reading his papers around in the community not out of any
>suppression of desire to or other unwillingness to criticize, but
>because many analysts openly admired what he was writing! Leonard
>Shengold is quoted somewhere, I think in Malcolm, as calling him 'Canada's
>national treasuer' (what an irony it is that of all the analysts Canada
>has produced Jeffrey Masson should be one who is by far the best known).
>Charles Hanly wrote a paper with him on narcissism. Ericsson made him head
>of the Freud Archives. Anna Freud invited him to stay with her when he was
>in London. This despite the fact that he was already casting the darkest
>aspersions on Freud's character.
>
 
Wasn't it Eissler that got Masson's appointment to the archives?