EVOLUTIONARY-FITNESS Archives

Evolutionary Fitness Discussion List

EVOLUTIONARY-FITNESS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wally Day <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Evolutionary Fitness Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:57:38 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
-------------------------------------------------------------

>But, we are not just designed for running. Humans are the ultimate
>do-it-all species. We climb pretty well, swim, pretty well, dive pretty
>well, most everything except fly. We are designed for lots of things
>besides just running. If anything, what we are primarily designed for
>is carrying loads at a walk, not running.

I agree - for the most part. However, the authors have a legitimate point
in that running *could* have been the driving force. It's possible that the
earliest "modern humans" had to run a whole bunch just to survive. But, as
the species progressed, the requirement to run was reduced because of
improved hunting tools along with the domestication of dogs.

100,000 years ago distance running could have been a daily event; 50,000
years ago not nearly as much; and 10,000 years ago not much at all.
Something like that.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The FAQ for Evolutionary Fitness is at http://www.evfit.com/faq.htm
To unsubscribe from the list send an e-mail to [log in to unmask]
with the words SIGNOFF EVOLUTIONARY-FITNESS in the _body_ of the e-mail.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2