Return-path: [log in to unmask]
From: [log in to unmask]
Full-name: Mowthpeece
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:26:33 EDT
Subject: Fwd: clarification
To: [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part2_552bfe91.24e41779_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 21
--part2_552bfe91.24e41779_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 8/12/99 5:09:45 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
>
> > bout the asymptomatic parasite visit , prezented by Dr zlovuck
> > My experience of " Naturel way of farming " show me that all the
> parasites
> > and bacteries are present in my orchard and all are asymptomatic not
> > affecting the plants in a desastrous manner like they do in a chemically
> > fertilised orchard.
> >
> > Available for more question
> > Jean-claude
> >
>
> Thank you for the very informative post Jean-Claude. I whole-
> heartedly agree that in a *natural* environment, parasites, and
> microbes and other ugly buggies would be a healthy
> addition to our existence, in their proper place. Even the sacred
> Wild Game can be hazardous to our health if it's infected with
> parasites that we can't handle. It is fool-hearty to think that
> we can handle *any* bug, at *any* time. If this were true, we
> would not even care about such things as salmanella and E. coli.
>
> I read that article about treating Crohn's Disease with parasites.
> In fact I have it right here, I printed it for my supervisor at work.
> I found it fascinating. And a part of me yearned to be back in
> touch with nature in such a way as to actually, willingly, carry
> worms in me. But I just c a n ' t do it, not deliberately.
>
> This keeps me separate from what is *natural*. And if I am this
> way, I know there are others. And just as I have had food
> poisoning several times in my life, I know others have also.
> And this is while always eating *cooked* meats. If I had eaten
> that food raw...how bad would I have caught it? Food
> poisoning is very common, and most of us get it from *cooked*
> meats that were accidentally undercooked.
>
> Just for the clarification of it, once again, and then I intend to
> drop this thread because people insist on ignoring the things I am
> saying, and interjecting what they WANT TO THINK I am saying.
>
> My objection is to the idea of eating raw *ANY* meat, in *ANY*
> amount, not raw meat eating in general. No amount of insulting,
> or negative feedback, will get me to believe that such a broad
> statement is safe to make.
>
> Those of you that sent your support by private e-mails, thank you
> very much.
>
> And to the others that don't feel this subject is important, I apologize
> for taking your time..but I will bet you will remember this thread the
> next time you get ill from food.
>
> Anna
> "...all paths lead somewhere,
> ...even the ones that end where they start."
>
>
--part2_552bfe91.24e41779_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-Path: <>
Received: from aol.com (rly-zb01.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.1]) by
air-zb02.mail.aol.com (v60.25) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:09:45
-0400
Received: from maelstrom.stjohns.edu (maelstrom.stjohns.edu [149.68.1.24])
by rly-zb01.mx.aol.com (v60.25) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:09:36
-0400
Received: from maelstrom.stjohns.edu (149.68.1.24) by maelstrom.stjohns.edu
(LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id
<[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 8:06:34 -0500
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:06:34 -0400
From: "L-Soft list server at St. John's University (1.8c)"
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
To: "Anna L. Abrante" <[log in to unmask]>
The distribution of your message dated Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:05:44 EDT with
subject "Re: clarification" has been rejected because you have exceeded the
daily per-user message limit for the PALEOFOOD list. Other than the list owner,
no one is allowed to post more than 4 messages per day. Please resend your
message at a later time if you still want it to be posted to the list.
------------------------ Rejected message (69 lines) --------------------------
Received: from imo11.mx.aol.com (198.81.17.1) by maelstrom.stjohns.edu (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 8:06:33 -0500
Received: from [log in to unmask]
by imo11.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v22.4.) id eIMQa07549 (4509)
for <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:05:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: [log in to unmask]
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:05:44 EDT
Subject: Re: [P-F] clarification
To: [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 21
In a message dated 8/12/99 3:46:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> bout the asymptomatic parasite visit , prezented by Dr zlovuck
> My experience of " Naturel way of farming " show me that all the parasites
> and bacteries are present in my orchard and all are asymptomatic not
> affecting the plants in a desastrous manner like they do in a chemically
> fertilised orchard.
>
> Available for more question
> Jean-claude
>
Thank you for the very informative post Jean-Claude. I whole-
heartedly agree that in a *natural* environment, parasites, and
microbes and other ugly buggies would be a healthy
addition to our existence, in their proper place. Even the sacred
Wild Game can be hazardous to our health if it's infected with
parasites that we can't handle. It is fool-hearty to think that
we can handle *any* bug, at *any* time. If this were true, we
would not even care about such things as salmanella and E. coli.
I read that article about treating Crohn's Disease with parasites.
In fact I have it right here, I printed it for my supervisor at work.
I found it fascinating. And a part of me yearned to be back in
touch with nature in such a way as to actually, willingly, carry
worms in me. But I just c a n ' t do it, not deliberately.
This keeps me separate from what is *natural*. And if I am this
way, I know there are others. And just as I have had food
poisoning several times in my life, I know others have also.
And this is while always eating *cooked* meats. If I had eaten
that food raw...how bad would I have caught it? Food
poisoning is very common, and most of us get it from *cooked*
meats that were accidentally undercooked.
Just for the clarification of it, once again, and then I intend to
drop this thread because people insist on ignoring the things I am
saying, and interjecting what they WANT TO THINK I am saying.
My objection is to the idea of eating raw *ANY* meat, in *ANY*
amount, not raw meat eating in general. No amount of insulting,
or negative feedback, will get me to believe that such a broad
statement is safe to make.
Those of you that sent your support by private e-mails, thank you
very much.
And to the others that don't feel this subject is important, I apologize
for taking your time..but I will bet you will remember this thread the
next time you get ill from food.
Anna
"...all paths lead somewhere,
...even the ones that end where they start."
--part2_552bfe91.24e41779_boundary--