Car amicos e amicas. Le particulas de Stan es minus de 12 particulas. Si, vos lo ha legite ben, minus de 12. Illos es jam acceptate insimul con le particulas latin. Amicalmente Josu Lavin 2013/6/27 Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> > Un error. :( Io intendeva expedir ad INTERLNG integre, e non solmente a > Stan ipse. > > On Tuesday, 27 Jun 2013 17:27:09 -0400, Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > Martedi, le 27 junio 2013 15:02:34 -0400, Mulaik, Stanley A < >> [log in to unmask]**edu <[log in to unmask]>> >> scribeva: >> >> Interlingua jam es morte, Paul, in le forma del parve gruppo de >>> personas qui lo usa. Cata anno plus mori. Facer emphase super un >>> variante del lingua que usa formas contrari al rationamento e theoria >>> de su elaboration, solmente proque su usatores non esseva >>> sophisticate linguisticamente como su creatores non va >>> impressionar le autoritates politic e linguistic del meritos >>> del lingua. Interlingua non es un esperanto, ni un occidental. >>> Illo es un extraction e standardization objective del elementos commun >>> in le major linguas de Europa e le Hemisphero Occidental. A causa de >>> isto illo es un >>> lingua ric in vocabulario. E mesmo si nos mori, le mesme lingua >>> pote esser extracte de iste linguas parlate per centos de milliones. >>> >> >> Per favor, vider mi essayo (in anglese) "Thoughts on IAL Success" >> http://www.panix.com/~**bartlett/thoughts.html<http://www.panix.com/~bartlett/thoughts.html>. Il ha duo factores critic: "Good Enough" (bastante bon) e "Stable Base" >> (fundamento stabile). Io scribeva (e continua asserer): >> >> "My point with this factor is that theoretical optimality is all well and >> good, but it is not at all sufficient by itself to ensure acceptance and >> use of an IAL, whereas another suboptimal but "good enough" language, taken >> together with other factors, may have relatively more success." >> >> e >> >> "Some conIAL designers fall into tinkering, ever striving for >> "perfection" as they see it. But as Andrew Large pointed out in his _The >> Artificial Language Movement_ ([Oxford]: Basil Blackwell, 1985; ISBN >> 0-631-14497-8; p. 154), >> >> 'Like the alchemists of old, artificial language projectors are not >> easily deterred by others' failures. They doggedly cling to the belief that >> success can be achieved if only the right mixture of ingredients can be >> blended in the correct proportions.' >> >> Sooner or later, people have to quit tinkering and _use_ something >> instead of dissipating the energy of the conIAL movement. Many people learn >> Esperanto in order to use it without getting deeply involved in >> metaconsiderations. Some people seem to get involved with conIALs for the >> sake of discussing them endlessly and never get around to trying to build a >> significant user community which will not spend its time talking about the >> language almost as if it were an end in itself rather than as a means to an >> end: improved human communication and understanding." >> >> Io renega tu assertion que "Interlingua jam es morte," sed io assere que >> essayos de facer que illo se conforma ad un puritate linguistic theoric lo >> occidera vermente. Io specula que "le autoritates politic e linguistic" non >> se interesa in re le characteristicas theoric del lingua. Lor question es, >> "Esque illo functiona ben como un lingua auxiliar?" >> >> Si, Stan, io es un "esperantisto" in re interlingua. Io lo dice fermente. >> Io cerca un ver lingua auxiliar. Interlingua pote esser (es) un tal, sed >> solmente si nos cessa persequer le sonio inutile de perfection theoric. A >> mi aviso, simplemente "un extraction e standardization objective del >> elementos commun in le major linguas de Europa e le Hemisphero Occidental" >> es un perdita del tempore e del effortio. Si, io es un "esperantisto." (E >> de novo, io non desira que interlingua deveni Ancora Un Altere Lingua >> Romanic.) >> >> Io non accepta tu propositiones theoric, e tu non accepta mi >> propositiones practic. Simplemente nos disaccorda, e probabilemente necun >> convincera le altere. >> > > -- > Paul Bartlett > > > -- > Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription: > http://listserv.icors.org/**archives/interlng.html<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html> > -- Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html