You're most welcome Honorary Dad. Right back at you. Best wishes for the  
new year 2011 and more fortified friendships.
 
Haruna.
Cirque du Soleil. Remind me to explain the theme of this year's show.
 
 
In a message dated 1/2/2011 12:30:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Hello my Dear Uncle, happy new year. How are you doing in  Fort Oglethorpe, 
are you  well fortified out there? I pray 2011 to free you from the  never 
ending rimbahpahpah that you been entangled into all these past  year.

--- On Sun, 1/2/11, Modou Nyang  <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


From:  Modou Nyang <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Haruna and  AL. Jawara. A conversation - In amicus of SS 
Daffeh Esq.
To:  [log in to unmask]
Date: Sunday, January 2, 2011, 12:26  PM

    
    Hello my Dear  Uncle, happy new year. How are you doing in Fort  
Oglethorpe, are you well fortified out there?  I pray 2011 

--- On Sat, 1/1/11,  Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>  wrote:


From:  Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:  Haruna and AL. Jawara. A conversation - In amicus of SS  Daffeh 
Esq.
To: [log in to unmask]
Date:  Saturday, January 1, 2011, 6:35 PM


I was forwarded this article by Al Jawara,  amicus to Mr. Musa Jeng's 
thesis on the basis for a  Gambia opposition party alliance. A compromise of 
sorts.  I want to commend Jawara for a careful and studied  amicus and for his 
due-diligence in ventilating the  underlying tenets of the Jeng Compromise. 
Vis; An  alliance of equal partners for the removal of an odious  governor in 
Yahya.
 
I am very pleased with Jawara's meticulous  attention to detail and the 
benign tone with which the  masterpiece amicus was delivered.
 
In amicus to Mr. SS Daffeh Esq., I wish to submit  these notes for Jeng and 
Jawara's considerations.  Perhaps a meeting of the minds is in the offing.
 
[Mr  Jeng’s Article and Mr Daffeh’s  Reaction

I can’t sit  back without expressing my  delight at Mr Jeng’s initial 
suggestion for a  compromise, but most importantly his response to Mr  Daffeh’s 
article. He has clearly shown that he is a  candidate of what would be 
described as elderly  statesman.

I hope Mr Daffeh read the point  newspaper this morning that Hamat Bah is 
contesting the  next election as a presidential candidate and not ally  of 
the UDP. There is much to learn from this and I hope  it opens up Mr Daffeh’s 
eye to see what people are  really talking about.] Al Jawara.
 
I happened to  be within earshot of Hon. Hamat's statements disposition  at 
the conclusion of the UDP's party congress recently  held in Jarra Soma. 
Hon. Hamat is to be commended for  landmark gallantry and sacrifice in his 
clairvoyant  association with the UDP for a commoner prosecution of  the 2006 
election in Gambia. And like all other such  sober amalgam, Hon. Hamat 
informs all Gambians and  sundry that absent any other serious effort at a common  
opposition party alliance, the NRP would reconstitute to  reclaim NRP's 
singular appeal and gravitas. It is this  gravitas that earned Hon. Hamat and 
the NRP a seat at  the infamous alliance conversations leading up to the  
2006 vote. I am delighted Hon. Hamat is a reliable  partner in those 
conversations and he and the NRP  deserve our full support and  grace.

[I  wanted to call the spade a spade here;
If you people  wanted to take comfort in ‘‘Mandinka majority  
tribe/Mandinka support UDP’’ phenomenon, then good luck,  but you need to sit back and 
closely peruse the two  articles from Mr Jeng and Jallow. UDP can continue 
to  finish second in every presidential elections as long as  time permits, 
but of what benefit will that pride  generate for their electorates and the 
country in  general.] AL Jawara.
 
It is rather unfortunate that Jawara  infuses ethnic discord in his 
otherwise brilliant  summary. To discount the voice and support of his  majority 
mandinka fellow citizens demonstrates an  ominous malignancy in Jawara's 
thought process and must  undermine the populist yearning of the compromise  of 
sorts that Jawara affords amicus for. The Mandinka  people of Gambia are a 
conscientious people like all  other ethnicities of Gambia. Any political 
party of  Gambia would desire the support of the majority of  Gambia's 
Mandinkas. It is safe to say that PDOIS, APRC,  NRP, GMC, PPP, and GDP, all enjoy a 
certain level  of support from Mandinkas of Gambia and any of them  would 
desire more formidable Mandinka support to equal  that enjoyed by the UDP. The 
best way to garner that  Mandinka support is not to estrange the Mandinka 
people  or demagogue their conscience to brow-beat them into  adoption. 
Conversely, it is common knowledge that UDP,  APRC, PDOIS, GMC, GDP, and PPP all 
have a  certain level of Fula, Sarahule, Wollof, Serer, Aku,  Jola, and 
Manjago support. All of the opposition parties  desire to augment their support 
among all these  ethnicities and the best way to garner that support  would 
certainly NOT be to estrange or villify the  ethnicities but to EARN their 
support. Whether UDP  finishes first, second, third, or fourth in any election 
 it prosecutes in Gambia, must not and will  not diminish the wisdom in 
augmenting its support  among the Mandinka, Jola, Fula, Sarahule, wollof, Aku,  
Serer, or Manjago communities. The pursuit of  support among any of 
Gambia's ethnicities is a positive  endeavour and is not a guarantee of finishing 
first,  second, third, fourth or fifth. The Mandinka just happen  to be the 
majority ethnicity of Gambia but an equally  significant constituent part of 
the Gambian polity. I  encourage Jawara to reconsider his dispensation 
toward  any of the constituent ethnicities of Gambia. PDOIS will  still need 
Mandinka support if it were to govern  Gambia.
 
[Please note that Yaya Jammeh continues to garner  support in every 
Mandinka constituency 
in the  country. In fact he won each of those constituencies  during past 
elections except Kiang West and will  continue to win them in coming 
elections.] Al  Jawara.
 
The foregoing is therefore evidence that the  Mandinka ethnicity is neither 
monolithic in  desire, nor absolutely tribalist in their outlook  for 
Gambia. I am pleased that Mr. Jawara so soon  recognizes Yahya's intelligence in 
not discounting the  voices and support of the Mandinka community. I  
encourage him and PDOIS to actively seek the support of  all the constituent 
ethnicities of Gambia without  sleight or exception.  

[So a true  coalition that is ethnically diverse, based on honesty  and 
trust, and devoid of ‘I am entitled to this’ concept  is what is needed for 
achieving the number one goal that  all of us shared – ending Jammeh’s 
presidency.] AL  Jawara.
 
It appears that Mr. Jawara has  forwarded a false premise of an inferior 
Mandinka  calculus in that if the UDP takes the Mandinka vote for  granted on 
account of ethnic affinity of Hon.  Ousainou Darbo, the UDP will continue to 
come second to  first and by denegrating the value of his fellow  citizens' 
votes, Jawara aims to reduce the aversed  fellow citizens' sovereignties. A 
concept PDOIS has hung  a lantern on for the good part of its utopian and  
lethargic existence in Gambia. It ought to serve as  instruction for Jawara 
and PDOIS therefore that an  ethnically diverse political party should be 
the resolve  of any conscientious party aspiring to governance in a  
multi-ethnic society. When ethnically-diverse political  parties seek to form an 
alliance, automatic diversity is  realized effortlessly. I encourage PDOIS to 
redouble  their efforts in marketing their ideas for governance to  all 
Gambia's ethnicities and actively seek their company  in PDOIS. SHort of that, 
PDOIS cannot be a reliable  partner in any meaningful alliance or coalition  
building. 20 years is a long time to be stuck at 2.25%  affinity in small 
Gambia.
 
[No body disputed the premise that UDP could lead  the opposition 
coalition, but there need to be a process  to get to that.] Al Jawara.
 
Indeed and nobody in their right mind would dispute  that obvious premise. 
If in fact as Mr. Jawara leads us  to believe that he nor PDOIS disputes 
this premise, I  encourage them to answer UDP's call to fall in line  behind 
the UDP, GDP, NRP, GMC, and PPP and  prosecute the 2011 elections with Hon. 
Ousainou Darboe  as flagbearer. I share with Jawara therefore that  the 
process necessary to accomplish that is to publish  in Foroyaa and The Point that 
such is their decision.  The UDP, GDP, NRP, GMC, and PPP will come pick them 
up  from that press conference. Or does Jawara have a  different idea of 
process after recognition of the  premise. I am comforted that it is a PROCESS 
that  brings Mr. Jawara and PDOIS to NOT disputing the  premise of a 
UDP-led alliance.

[I personally does not subscribe to an  entitlement syndrome especially 
when it comes to  politics.] Al Jawara.
 
It is foolhardy to train on  intransigence for intransigence's sakes. 
Instead of NOT  subscribing to an entitlement syndrome, I encourage  Jawara and 
PDOIS to review the entitlement proper and  discern whether the right to such 
entitlement is issue.  It is not helpful to say on the one hand that "No 
body  disputes the premise of a UDP-led alliance" and on the  other that "I 
personally do not subscribe to an  entitlement syndrome" because the one who 
has the  malignant syndrome is the astigmatism patient. Jawara  must examine 
his conflicting messages. Is the UDP  entitled to leading an alliance of 
Gambia's opposition  parties or not?
 
[The examples you put forward to invalidate Sidia’s  legitimate opinion is 
inaccurately presented and I am  sure deliberately malicious. I take you as 
politically  astute but for you to rely on such examples as similar  to that 
of Gambia is what I will call superficial (glib)  argument and artful at 
best than SIdia’s. If the British  constitution was that of Gambia, or the 
other countries  you quoted, then there would be no need for  conservatives to 
form a coalition government with  liberal democrats. The conservatives would 
have formed a  government by themselves and would not need a  coalition.] 
Al Jawara.
 
This is the problem with blowing hot air. The  conservative Party of 
Britain needed the Liberal  democrats of Britain in order to FORM A GOVERNMENT of  
GREAT BRITAIN. WHether or not the British constitution  is a fact simile of 
the Gambian constitution or vice  versa. Forming a GOVERNMENT is premised 
on majority  universal suffrage of the constituent  ethnicities/interests of 
Britain. It was not the  instruction of the British constitution that the  
Conservative party form a GOVERNMENT with the Liberal  Democratic Party. As a 
student of democratic governance,  Mr. Jawara ought to know that the 
election is the  precursor to government not a deliberation by a  constitutional 
court. I suspect Mr. Jawara wished to  frame his notes another way.

[For the Gambia, in case you don’t know, even  20% of the vote could make 
you president as long as it  is the highest.] AL Jawara.
 
And for 20% to be the highest, the  majority of those who voted in such 
election would have  to vote for the President therefore. All the more reason  
an alliance of opposition parties is far superior to  each of them 
prosecuting the election independently  unless the voter roll is substantially 
augmented and  electoral fraud minimized or eliminated totally. It is  evident 
therefore that Mr. Jawara desires an alliance of  opposition parties to 
prosecute 2011's elections in  Gambia. 

[Gambia is a multi-tribe country  and I can say for certain that Gambians 
are not strictly  tribal. Even at household level, Gambian families are  the 
most multi- culturally diverse and intertwined  institutions in the 
sub-region. There is so much  inter-marrying and jokes going around that the only 
time  people begin to really look at tribal identity with  seriousness is when 
Jammeh came to power.] Al  Jawara.
 
Generally when people consider an issue, they  gather their faculties and 
train on sobriety. In this  instance, Mr. Jawara reassures us that an undue  
reliance on the support of a majority ethnicity for  superlative electoral 
performance is a welcome treasure.  He also certifies that even though Yahya 
is the inurer  of ethnic discord and considerations, the Mandinka,  Fula, 
Jola, wollof, Aku, Sarahule, Serer, and Manjago  communities continue to 
sustain him in office. Why then  would Yahya's pursuit of the Mandinka vote be  
detrimental to the UDP or PDOIS for that matter. If  PDOIS had as much 
Mandinka support as the UDP or NRP,  imagine what the conversation for alliance  
would sound like Mr. Jawara.
 
[Because of his cowardice, he played the tribal  politics so wisely to his 
advantage. It used 
to be  Mandinkas who bear the brunt of his vicious tactics, but  now tribe 
is no longer the issue and as long as his  lieutenants pass their effective 
utility, they will be  sacrificed no matter what tribe they come from (case 
in  point is Lang Tombong, Bo Badgie etc). His game is going  on well for 
him.] Al Jawara.
 
I trust Jawara is pleased now that  Yahya is ethnically-blind. Is it 
therefore healthy to  re-introduce ethnic discord and sleight into the PDOIS  
politics I wonder.

[So Daffeh what people  are talking about is a sensible compromise that 
will put  all the opposition parties under one big tent.] Al  Jawara.
 
And what would that "sensible compromise" be pray  tell?
 
[There is no need for UDP supporters to be arrogant  because of their 
so-called size.] Al Jawara.
 
It is never useful to be arrogant when you seek  augmented affinities. If 
anything, the UDP is not  resting on their laurels for humungus sakes. The 
UDP,  NRP, APRC, GMC, GDP, PPP all continue to engage the  electorate to 
augment their support. And they should be  encouraged by all of us in that light.
 
[Mai Fatty is a faint line in the sky with no  significance (or as 
Mandinkas will say – the decoration  at the base of a gun has no use to the gun 
because  whether it is there or not the gun will fire).] Al  Jawara.
 
I am informed the Sarahule, wollof,  Jola, Fula, Aku, Serer, and Manjago 
all have similar  proverbs in their literary repertoir. It serves no  useful 
purpose to denegrade GMC or Mai Fatty or to cast  aspersions on the Mandinka 
supporters of UDP and GMC.  That will never be valuable for PDOIS or Mr. 
Jawara's  ethnicity. The Mandinkas' significance in Gambia can  only issue from 
the significance of the Sarahule, Jola,  Aku, Serer, Fula, Manjago, and 
wollof. I encourage Mr.  Jawara to train on greater sobriety.

[Case in point is that people are not  interested in fault finding but a 
way forward. I wanted  you to make sense of why Hamat Bah has decided to go 
out  of the UDP camp to contest the next election as a  presidential candidate 
on his own.] Al Jawara.
 
In case Mr. Jawara was not within  earshot of Hon. Hamat and NRP's 
reasoning, I would  encourage him to seek audience with Hon. Hamat for  greater 
clarity of his position in this matter. It is  disturbing to realize that 
because UDP has attained what  PDOIS has spent the better part of its life 
foraging  for, and instead of refining its message to garner more  support, PDOIS 
spends its time tearing UDP, NRP, GMC,  APRC, and GDP down. Time was, PPP was 
PDOIS' greatest  enemy and PDOIS did not realize then that a diminutive  
PPP equals an even more lethargic PDOIS. They tore PPP  down in their 
charlatanries only to inherit the residue  of PPP. And with unbridled glee. It will 
be the sign of  the changing times.
 
Haruna Darbo.
Fort  Oglethorpe.
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤  To 
unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings,  go to the Gambia-L Web interface 
at: _http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html_ 
(http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html)    
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: 
_http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l_ 
(http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l)   To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail  to: 
[log in to unmask]  
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤



¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤  To 
unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the  Gambia-L Web interface 
at: _http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html_ 
(http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html)   
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: 
_http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l_ 
(http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l)   To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: 
[log in to unmask] 
(mip:[log in to unmask])   
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤


¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤  To 
unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web  interface 
at: _http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html_ 
(http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html)   
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: 
_http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l_ 
(http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l)   To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: 
[log in to unmask] 
(mailto:[log in to unmask])   ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤


¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤