[log in to unmask] wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">
How many of you would feel confident about identifying "French" vs. "Texas" limestone?  Christopher
c,

Not me, I'm not a geologist neither.
Sidney Horenstein sounds solid to me. But if it is the Texas limestone I know what that looks like. I have been to the hole it comes out of. It was a hell of a fine trip to go find it. There may have been reasons though that it was called French? For the George Rogers Clark memorial in Vincennes, Indiana they had to say that the granite was no longer available as at the time the specs for restoration were writ I suspect that it was too politically sensitive to mention that it may very well have come from Canada to begin with. And we all know how the Canadians are about their Granite of Mass Destruction (GMD).

][<en

"New stone shall be Texas Cordova shellstone. The stone is fossiliferous limestone from the Cretaceous Age, mapped in the Walnut Formation. The original source of the stone is no longer available. It was located three miles west of Cedar Park, Texas, on the Travis and Williamson County line. The source currently available is fifteen miles north by northwest of the original quarry and is eight miles southwest of Liberty Hill, Texas."
-- To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html