There is 1 message totalling 193 lines in this issue.
Topics of the day:
1. Poland vs USA on social culture of heritage conservation
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 06:23:28 -0400
From: Gabriel Orgrease <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Poland vs USA on social culture of heritage conservation
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--Boundary_(ID_Xkk5YX8fj9fKSumOyT9sVw)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
[log in to unmask] wrote:
> My first inclination was to describe this as Communism At Work. Then
> it dawned on me that there are plenty of movies of Da Krauts removing
> and sorting through bombed heaps of brick.
>
> In both cases, it seems to me that describing that process as direct
> citizen participation in heritage conservation is romanticizing it,
> more than a little.
Ralph,
I can relate to your sentiment in regard to romanticism though my sense
is that within a more informed context as to what has gone on and what
is currently going on with heritage conservation in Poland that it
suddenly becomes a whole lot less romantic to suggest the intensity of
voluntary citizen participation as a characteristic that may distinguish
the preservation movement in Eastern Europe from that in the USA. I
provided one quote that illustrates what I sense, I can provide more
fragments that stand out to me at least starkly to represent what I see
as a difference in the Polish perspective. I am not Polish, you know
that, but I do go there with a curiosity as to just where did all of the
Polish workforce that I have been involved with over the last twenty
years in NYC come from? Let alone that our mutual friend Mr. Weiss,
through his mother, is of Polish ancestry. There have not been quite so
many Germans working on cutting out mortar joints in NYC, and I presume
with the current workforce demographics that I will get to Peru if I
live long enough, though Pakistan is a close second after the Ukraine or
St. Petersburg. What I end with is not so much to accept my presumptions
but more questions and for me the questions lead to a desire to go find
answers that for me add up.
Geographic area of Poland in square miles is close to that of Arizona.
Population of Poland is close to a combination of New York (including
NYC), New Jersey, Connecticut and Pennsylvania. We won't confuse
ourselves with Chicago. Poland has roughly 1/8th the population of the
USA. If we combine the population of USA with Canada the population of
Poland is 1/10th.
I give the above for the reason that the APT Bulletin and the Polish
Bulletyn are of near identical technical format (though the Bulletyn is
in full color), peer reviewed, and of nearly equal distribution say at
1,500 for rough consideration (we will not get into who sends what to
libraries). This breaks down that in Poland one can almost say that 1 in
26,000 people are interested in heritage conservation, whereas if we
only look at the USA it is 1 in 200,000. If we add Canada, and as APT is
a predominantly US-Canadian organization it makes sense to do that, we
are then comparing it to 1 in 225,000. We can go on from there to argue
comparisons of the full range of historic conservation related
publications and a cursory look at the above data may become much more
complicated say if we try to compare Traditional Building or
Preservation in relationship of their format, market, and the general
population at large. In Poland my perception, having looked at the shelf
of periodicals on display in the cultural exchange center in Krakow,
that there are something like at least 8 heritage conservation
publications in Poland. They all seem to be in full color, some of them
with advertising, most without. Regardless, the comparison between the
APT Bulletin and the Polish Bulletyn opens to me a consideration of more
weight to the thought that the Polish as a percentage of population are
much more involved in and concerned over their built heritage than we
are in the USA. At this time, with all of the economic stimulation that
Poland is going through with their participation in the EU I do not
presume that it is Communism at Work.
I thank you though for the opportunity to be challenged in my perceptions.
][<
--
Orgrease-Crankbait <http://orgrease-crankbait.blogspot.com/> Video,
audio, writings, words, spoken word, dialogs, graphic collage and the
art of fiction in language and literature.
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
--Boundary_(ID_Xkk5YX8fj9fKSumOyT9sVw)
Content-type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]</a>
wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:[log in to unmask]"
type="cite">My first inclination was to describe this as Communism At
Work. Then it dawned on me that there are plenty of movies of Da
Krauts removing and sorting through bombed heaps of brick.<br>
<br>
In both cases, it seems to me that describing that process as direct
citizen participation in heritage conservation is romanticizing it,
more than a little. <br>
</blockquote>
Ralph,<br>
<br>
I can relate to your sentiment in regard to romanticism though my sense
is that within a more informed context as to what has gone on and what
is currently going on with heritage conservation in Poland that it
suddenly becomes a whole lot less romantic to suggest the intensity of
voluntary citizen participation as a characteristic that may
distinguish the preservation movement in Eastern Europe from that in
the USA. I provided one quote that illustrates what I sense, I can
provide more fragments that stand out to me at least starkly to
represent what I see as a difference in the Polish perspective. I am
not Polish, you know that, but I do go there with a curiosity as to
just where did all of the Polish workforce that I have been involved
with over the last twenty years in NYC come from? Let alone that our
mutual friend Mr. Weiss, through his mother, is of Polish ancestry.
There have not been quite so many Germans working on cutting out mortar
joints in NYC, and I presume with the current workforce demographics
that I will get to Peru if I live long enough, though Pakistan is a
close second after the Ukraine or St. Petersburg. What I end with is
not so much to accept my presumptions but more questions and for me the
questions lead to a desire to go find answers that for me add up.<br>
<br>
Geographic area of Poland in square miles is close to that of Arizona.
Population of Poland is close to a combination of New York (including
NYC), New Jersey, Connecticut and Pennsylvania. We won't confuse
ourselves with Chicago. Poland has roughly 1/8th the population of the
USA. If we combine the population of USA with Canada the population of
Poland is 1/10th.<br>
<br>
I give the above for the reason that the APT Bulletin and the Polish
Bulletyn are of near identical technical format (though the Bulletyn is
in full color), peer reviewed, and of nearly equal distribution say at
1,500 for rough consideration (we will not get into who sends what to
libraries). This breaks down that in Poland one can almost say that 1
in 26,000 people are interested in heritage conservation, whereas if we
only look at the USA it is 1 in 200,000. If we add Canada, and as APT
is a predominantly US-Canadian organization it makes sense to do that,
we are then comparing it to 1 in 225,000. We can go on from there to
argue comparisons of the full range of historic conservation related
publications and a cursory look at the above data may become much more
complicated say if we try to compare Traditional Building or
Preservation in relationship of their format, market, and the general
population at large. In Poland my perception, having looked at the
shelf of periodicals on display in the cultural exchange center in
Krakow, that there are something like at least 8 heritage conservation
publications in Poland. They all seem to be in full color, some of them
with advertising, most without. Regardless, the comparison between the
APT Bulletin and the Polish Bulletyn opens to me a consideration of
more weight to the thought that the Polish as a percentage of
population are much more involved in and concerned over their built
heritage than we are in the USA. At this time, with all of the economic
stimulation that Poland is going through with their participation in
the EU I do not presume that it is Communism at Work.<br>
<br>
I thank you though for the opportunity to be challenged in my
perceptions.<br>
<br>
][<<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<title></title>
<a href="http://orgrease-crankbait.blogspot.com/">Orgrease-Crankbait</a>
Video, audio, writings, words, spoken word, dialogs, graphic collage
and the
art of fiction in language and literature.<br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<div class="moz-signature"><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html
--Boundary_(ID_Xkk5YX8fj9fKSumOyT9sVw)--
------------------------------
End of BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Digest - 9 Apr 2008 to 10 Apr 2008 (#2008-92)
************************************************************************
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html