In a message dated 12/27/2007 12:03:53 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask] writes: I am still not convinced that quick-obsolete buildings are not economically more sound than building for permanence, and then having to toss the whole thing out. But then Sempronius was a friend of mine. Biggus Dickus, You have an interesting point, which is sort of a problem for those of us who think things ought to be done right the first time. Who needs acid-free archival paper, much less parchment, to blow your nose, or wipe your ass? Ralphus Jerseyus **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) -- To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to: <http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>