In a message dated 12/27/2007 12:03:53 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

I am still not convinced that quick-obsolete buildings are not  economically 
more sound than building for permanence, and then having to toss  the whole 
thing out.  But then Sempronius was a friend of mine. 
 



Biggus Dickus,
 
You have an interesting point, which is sort of a problem for those of us  
who think things ought to be done right the first time.   Who needs  acid-free 
archival paper, much less parchment, to blow your nose, or wipe  your ass?
 
Ralphus Jerseyus



**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes 
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>