I've checked online numerous times in the past and I've, unfortunately, never found an objective site re Weston-Price's findings. They're all biased, being either fanatically for or fanatically against him. While there's no reliable independent analysis of his findings re diet there are some websites which claim that his past research on his "focal infection"(re root-canal therapy) theory has been disproved by later research. Here's an admittedly heavily biased website which goes into this in detail:- http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/holisticdent.html (of course the article's reference to the root-canal therapy research has no relevance whatsoever to Weston-Price's findings re diet, I just include it because there's nothing else). Weston-Price's colleague Dr Pottenger also did a famous well-controlled scientific experiment in the 1930s with cats, to prove that a raw food diet was better for humans - there's plenty of data re this online. The scientific establishment view the study as flawed as, once taurine was introduced into processed pet-food, the most serious(but not all) of the health-problems in cats fed on processed food, went away. Of course, the establishment tends to ignore the multitude of accounts from pet-owners that raw, unprocessed food is much healthier for their animals. I find that, while the Pottenger experiment was definitely above board, that there was a slight flaw in it. Dr Pottenger fed his cats on the raw regime with plenty of raw cows' milk, and the latter is hardly something that would be part of the diet of cats in the wild. It would have been better if he'd done a controlled study with some cats fed only meats/organ-meats, some fed only on raw cows' milk and some fed only on processed pet-food. Anyway, given the definite lack of reliable analysis of Weston-Price's work, I tend to only trust in Weston-Price's work when his findings are more or less in agreement with the far more numerous and more comprehensive studies done on the health and diet of Palaeolithic-era humans(though, of course, Palaeo studies also have their flaws in some areas) - certainly, his advocation of Neolithic-era foods such as raw dairy, salt and fermented grain is highly dubious, given the extensive scientific data available re the sudden collapse in human health in the Neolithic period. Geoff _________________________________________________________________ Txt a lot? Get Messenger FREE on your mobile. https://livemessenger.mobile.uk.msn.com/