Dan,  I don't know USENET from your great Uncle Harry but, as far as I'm
concerned they are ALL WET.  I top post and really appreciate those who do.
The reason, then I can just read what the current poster is saying.  If I
need a refresher as to what they are refering to I can scan through the
previous post but I don't have to wade through it to find the current post.
Ruth




At 10:28 AM -0500 2/28/06, Becker, Dan wrote:
>See below.


>And in a historical aside, under USENET conventions top-posting is
>considered very poor form and a gross violation of netiquette. Preserve
>USENET!
>
>dan the apostrophe prince becker
-- 
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Dummerston, VT

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>