> >>I'm sending you my response to your question privately because it's kind >of > >>lost in the shuffle at the paleo site. > > > >I got it both on the list and privately -- did it maybe post later than >when > >you hit 'send'? > >This is a very weird post - something I would expect from someone who >received a computer for Christmas - not from someone who has posted on >the Internet for years. Ken, you may not have meant it, but your "expectations" comment strikes me as more than a just a little condescending. >There are no attributions to these statements at all, in other words, >nothing about who said them, when, where, what, why, etc. Well, I got Adrienne Smith's message both privately and on the list twice. So that to which I'm responding shouldn't strike a list member as an earth-shattering mystery. >You use ">". Are you a replying to a previous post? No, I just made the whole thing up. Not. You didn't just get YOUR computer for Christmas, did you? >If so, where is the "Re:" and/or "Was (..." in the Subject line? The thread to which Adrienne responded was "Re: What does it take to loose weight: was Re: sweet potatoes." Since Adrienne's message addressed something very specific, I thought it might be better to respond to her post by way of a new thread name given both the topic and the already-long title. But apparently that's a cardinal sin. Dori Zook, Denver, CO _________________________________________________________________ Take off on a romantic weekend or a family adventure to these great U.S. locations. http://special.msn.com/local/hotdestinations.armx