Hi all, I agree with the comments made here, with this added point: Window Eyes and Window Eyes Pro costs a few hundred dollars less than JFW. If you are spending your own money as I did then this is a significant consideration. Also, I don't like the JFW copy protection scheme. Others live with it, but I am glad not to have to worry with it. JFW does work slightly better when dealing with columns and tables, but this is of no concern for my computer use. And I think Window Eyes works better for my web useage. Will K4SAY [log in to unmask] [log in to unmask] On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Louis Kim Kline wrote: > Hi Bob. > > I think you will get passionate endorsements on both of the major screen > readers, and the JAWS users will swear up and down that JAWS is best, and > the Window-Eyes users will swear up and down that Window-Eyes is best. > > In reality, I think you will find either one to be a considerable > improvement over the screen reader that is built into Zoomtext. The > reality is that both have strengths and weaknesses. For my own use, I like > JAWS, but that is because it fits my style of computer operation a little > better. I could certainly do the job with Window-Eyes. > etc.