Was it with Russia? I'm thinking Alaska, with the Steward Purchase. On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:41:14 -0400 "Barber, Kenneth L." <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > No, not the uk. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kathy Salkin > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:31 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: i little tid bit for our > discussions > > This treaty is still in force, I suppose? Was > it with the UK? > > Kat > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 07:55:59 -0400 "Barber, > Kenneth L." > wrote: > > > With all the discussion of the constitution, > > the articles of confederation > > (pre-constitution) and in general history, do > > any of you know the one state > > that can still legally maintain it own navy? > > The clue is that a treaty > > supersedes the constitution. This fact is one > > reason why there is so much > > scrutiny of treaties in this country. > > >