I am reading "The Glucose Revolutions" because I like to refine my arguments when someone gives me the usual line about carbs being good and fat being bad. What really amazes me about the book is they basically have the same facts as say the Eades' do in "Protein Power" but since they have already decided to start with the hypotheses that fat is bad for you they are not open to exploring other avenues of thought. Also, they even talk about how we ate mostly protein (but not fat) 700,000 years ago to support their argument that we should eat a lot of low glycemic index foods. They even mention in one part of the book that high insulin levels cause all kinds of problems but still insist we should eat at least 60% of our diet as carbs. I wish I could go to a conference where they are talking about this and ask them " well then how do you explain the Inuits?" Mark