> From: Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]> > But be aware that almost nobody accepts his punk eek > theory or <snip> Todd, the *vast* majority of nutritional scientists do not accept the basic tenets of paleolithic nutrition - yet that does not, in any way, invalidate paleo. I think there is probably a happy medium between the PE theories of Gould and the more traditional Darwinian theories. PE during times of great environmental stress, grudual adaptation during times of lesser environmental stress. I do believe, however, that the concept of "static" genes is hooey. Too many examples of adaptation. > From: P & L Ventura <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Edible landscape suggestions Thanks for the suggestions. For anyone interested, there is a list-group at www.onelist.com that focuses on edible landscaping ([log in to unmask]). Also, here's a couple of links to sites that market edible landscape plants and such (no affiliation). I checked out Eat-it, and they have a nice selection, with variations of each plant adaptable for different zones. http://www.Eat-it.com http://why2k.virtualave.net/ http://www.onegreenworld.com/