LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for C-PALSY Archives

   

C-PALSY Archives

C-PALSY Archives


C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

C-PALSY Home

C-PALSY Home

C-PALSY  February 2003

C-PALSY February 2003

Subject:

Re: curb ramps and losing the ADA and all civil rights

From:

"K. Salkin" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

K. Salkin

Date:

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 03:24:51 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (102 lines)

Mag, please give us the background of this case.  Thanks!

Kat
----- Original Message -----
From: "Magenta Raine" <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.c-palsy
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:19 AM
Subject: curb ramps and losing the ADA and all civil rights


> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> Barden V. City of Sacramento
>
> It's really unfortunate that we can't put ALL anti-discrimination laws
under
> one law. The Civil Rights laws of 1964, the Anti-discrimination laws for
> women, and the Civil Rights laws for people with disabilities. All have at
> their core that NOBODY should be discriminated against for something they
had
> no control over: Race, Sex or Disability. It's too bad we need any
> anti-discrimination laws at all, but we do need them, as history will
show,
> so we have the laws.
>
> In the 1980s people with disabilities said, "We are being discriminated
> against in these same areas. It is a historic fact. We can't get jobs,
> neighborhoods discriminate, and schools don't want us there." So, we
lobbied,
> we presented literally tons of valid evidence to Congress and the House.
We
> fought, and we thought we won when Congress drafted the ADA for the first
> President Bush to sign. Now, Bush Junior is in the White House, and he and
> the Supreme court, and the State of California are striking out against
equal
> protection under the law for part of the population.
>
> How does it affect you? You see, disability doesn't care which sex you
are,
> it doesn't care what race or religion you are, it affects people in all
> economic categories. I know most people would rather not think about it,
but
> you can acquire a disability at any point in life. To eliminate the ADA,
or
> take away our recourse, is simply immoral.
>
> I think Americans are basically good people. They are aware that if the
> streets are not safe for another growing population -- the elderly, as
well
> as people with mobility and visual impairments, then that means we can't
do
> that most American activity of all -- shop and generally contribute to a
> capitalistic society.
>
> Recent articles suggest the actual number of Americans with disabilities
is
> around 77 million. That's a tremendous resource if you think about it. You
> remember the Bus strikes that paralyzed many Southern cities in the
Sixties,
> don't you? You remember the grape and lettuce boycotts of the 1960s and
> 1970s? Any business would be daft to ignore 77 million Americans and their
> friends and families. We aren't going to go back into the institutions, we
> aren't going back to the basements, and we won't be locked up in closets
> anymore. We may not be beautiful to look at, but if you were to look
inside,
> you'd see us as God intended us to see all people -- as human beings all
> worthy of love and respect. Yes, that's right, I said we're human beings.
>
> A simple test: See how you would want your governor and your country to
treat
> you if you or a loved one were born with a disability. Yes, it is that
> simple. The will to change a system is born out of your respect for all
human
> beings, not just those with disabilities. And, as was always taught to me;
> Where there's a will, there's a way. I urge all former civil rights
activists
> to join us in our struggle. We must all be vigilant, because if the ADA
goes,
> there will be a domino effect that will affect all Civil Rights
legislation.
>
> So, Mr. Lockyer, Mr. Davis, stop trying to turn back the hands of time. As
> President Bush once said, "You're either with us or against us." Do you
think
> that 77 million of us will get out to vote? You better believe it. And if
we
> all enroll one friend that's going to be 144 million, and so on.
>
> Budget crises? I don't think there would be one if Mr. Davis hadn't let
the
> energy companies run loose. Tax Junk food, Tax Alcohol. As I said before,
> where there's a will there is a way to fund all the programs -- there's a
way
> to fix all the sidewalks. Please pull the Barden v. Sacramento Supreme
Court
> case off the docket, and rethink your ideas.
>
> Sincerely,
> Tamar Raine

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager