OK, Y'ALL. I'M NOT SHOUTING--JUST KEEPING MY TEXT APART FROM KAT'S
From a benefits site:
Employers Start to See Link Between Health Productivity
Researchers say that employers will take action when they are offered
easy-to-use, verifiable methods of determining how employee illness affec=
by Kate Mulligan
Employers are beginning to take a serious look at how the health of their
employees affects the bottom line, according to information presented at =
Washington Business Group on Health (WBGH) meeting in March (Psychiatric =
Walter Stewart, Ph.D., M.P.H, director of the AdvancePCS Center for Work =
Health and an adjunct professor at Johns Hopkins University, spoke on "Ge=
a Handle on the True Costs of Illness to Improve Productivity" and later
expanded on his comments in an interview with Psychiatric News.
AdvancePCS provides pharmacy benefits management (PBM) and other
Stewart said that a key element in persuading employers to act on the lin=
between health and productivity is providing them with quantitative data =
actual costs and an easy-to-understand metric that translates into a dire=
dollar value and applies broadly across all occupations and work settings.
"Most employers know there=92s a link between health and productivity, bu=
because the link has been difficult to quantify, they have chosen not to =
he told Psychiatric News.
In part, quantification has been difficult, according to Stewart, because
research has focused on productivity (how much an employee produces) as
opposed to productive time (number of effective hours worked) and because
easy-to-use measurement tools are not available.
Business factors such as the work environment can affect productivity,
weakening a causal relationship between the health of an employee and wha=
or she accomplishes at work.
American Productivity Audit
Stewart and his colleagues began the American Productivity Audit last Jul=
with telephone interviews of a random sample of U.S. workers each day. Th=
first full year of the survey will be completed June 30, with a total of
The five- to 15-minute survey interview covers items such as occupation
description, health assessment, missed days of work due to health conditi=
(self and others), reduced performance at work because of health conditio=
and demographic factors such as age and sex.
Before beginning the audit, the research team tested six different
questionnaires and two time periods of recall. Two weeks was the longest
period for which recall was deemed reliable, according to Stewart.
After validation of the interview questions, the research team began
conducting 2,000 telephone interviews of workers in randomly selected
households each month. The database now includes results of more than 17,=
Stewart analyzed the prevalence of 11 common ailments during a two-week p=
of recall among subjects in the database. For purposes of his analysis, h=
separated "fatigue" and "sad/blue," although he recognizes an overlap.
Sad/blue is not synonymous with a diagnosis of depression. Stewart plans
follow-up studies to determine what percentage of workers reporting feeli=
sad/blue meet diagnostic criteria for depression and the implications of =
diagnosis on an employer=92s costs.
Headache and other pain conditions were reported most frequently. Fatigue=
second, with 42 percent reporting at least one episode during the precedi=
two weeks. About 29 percent of the respondents reported feeling sad/blue.
The annual cost of employees=92 lost productive hours due to the conditio=
above is more than $180 billion.
Using the interview results, Stewart developed data on hours of lost
productive time (while an employee was at work or absent from work) among
those with one of the ailments specified (see chart). Fatigue and sad/blu=
were outranked by cold/flu, headache/pain, digestive problems, and arthri=
in terms of number of lost productive hours.
Stewart also tested his methods of calculating lost productive hours with=
staff of the AdvancePCS call center. He had access to records showing
productivity of employees in terms of calls answered and time on line and
compared those records with self-reports.
Extrapolating from the database, Stewart estimated the total cost each ye=
the top five episodic health conditions in the U.S. workforce by gender. =
combined the categories of fatigue and sad/blue because he is still devel=
a method of separating the costs.
The combined category of fatigue and sad/blue ranks third, with estimated
annual costs of $17.8 billion for men and $14.2 billion for women. These =
include lost work time due to missed days and hours and reduced performan=
translated into lost hours.
Stewart envisions a five-stage implementation plan with employers. As the
first stage, he will offer an employer a free estimate of the costs of
work-related illnesses at that company or organization.
Stewart can tailor his database to fit the demographics of individual
companies. "For example," he said, "the average age of employees at Advan=
is about five years lower than the national average." The age and sex
distribution of a workforce, as well as other demographics, have implicat=
for the prevalence of various ailments, as well as for the amount of time=
because of the illnesses of family members.
The second stage would be to conduct an employer-specific audit. Research=
such as pilot studies and focus groups, is being conducted now to determi=
how best to communicate with employees and to understand how receptive th=
are to this work. Stewart would then work with the employer to prioritize
illnesses in terms of their impact on costs and the likelihood that they =
be successfully addressed with low-cost interventions.
He said, "For any one condition, 70 percent to 80 percent of the lost
productive time is concentrated in 20 percent to 35 percent of the employ=
The fourth stage would be to develop tools and services to address the
conditions, and the fifth stage would be to evaluate the benefits of the
interventions by conducting follow-up surveys where the costs of lost
productive time are compared with estimates obtained in previous surveys.
AdvancePCS is conducting pilot studies with five companies on this
implementation approach. Stewart said, "One of those companies (which can=
be named) has a workforce of about 23,000 individuals. We=92re estimating=
the company loses $60 million each year due to all illnesses. Five condit=
account for 65 percent of the loss." The figure includes lost productive =
(due to missed days or missed hours and reduced performance at work)
translated into lost hours.
Lloyd Sederer, M.D., director of APA=92s Division of Clinical Services, s=
"At the heart of our business initiative program is the belief that treat=
for depression and other mental illnesses is important for the individual=
is also good business. That is the message that we take consistently to
The program is an APA effort that started two years ago to educate the
business community that providing good mental health services can positiv=
impact their bottom line (Psychiatric News, July 20, 2001).
Sederer, along with Ron Z. Goetzel, Ronald J. Ozminkowski, and Tami L. Ma=
the MEDSTAT Group, published an article, "The Business Case for Quality M=
Health Services: Why Employers Should Care About the Mental Health and
Well-Being of their Employees" in the April issue of Journal of Occupatio=
and Environmental Medicine. The MEDSTAT Group is a health information com=
The authors reported available information on employee depression and its
impact on business, including the results of a recent analysis that found=
depressed workers cost their employers 70 percent more in annual health c=
when compared with nondepressed colleagues.
They also suggested promising research opportunities in light of their
relevance, time feasibility, data availability, and affordability.
KAT'S COMMENTS ARE BELOW:
OK, if you've read this far, let me say this worries me. What if they do=
stop at depression or flu or colds? What if they expand the concept of
illness to disabilities? Very scary.
From: Kathy Salkin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:42 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Illness in the Workplace
This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet
Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message.
If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then
open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.