LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for AXSLIB-L Archives

   

AXSLIB-L Archives

AXSLIB-L Archives


AXSLIB-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

AXSLIB-L Home

AXSLIB-L Home

AXSLIB-L  January 2001

AXSLIB-L January 2001

Subject:

Re: A for ACCESSIBILITY

From:

Kelly Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Library Access -- http://www.rit.edu/~easi

Date:

Fri, 5 Jan 2001 04:57:46 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (113 lines)

Hi Ron,

Do you know for certain that the six month clock starts ticking in
February?  I've read in some quarters that for purposes of the six month
clock, the effective date was indeed back in December?

Kelly

At 01:13 PM 1/4/01 -0800, you wrote:
>I would like to make a couple of clarifications to your message. Section 508
>applies to "State Agencies" in states that have received funding under the
>Tech Act, which in a nutshell is all states. The issues come up in what is a
>state agency, and here is were you may find that most local libraries are
>exempt, since they are not state agencies. It will most likely apply to
>state libraries, and public and college university libraries in the majority
>of instances.
>
>They current standards will go into effect on February 21st, 2001, and
>agencies will have six months from that date to comply with the standards.
>
>Ron Stewart
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Audrey Gorman [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 9:18 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: A for ACCESSIBILITY
>
>
>Ellen and all,
>
>I too believe that Section 508 may be a big help to accessibility advocates
>in the long run.  However, 508 applies (ie, has legal teeth)for federal
>agencies, not the society at large.  There are even some federal agencies
>that are exempt. It may apply to some state functions when federal money is
>involved, maybe even state libraries.  That's still being teased out by the
>Department of Justice and others.
>
>But experts on 508 whom I've asked say that most libraries probably are not
>subject to the requirements of the statute.  Besides that, the federal
>accessibility standards still must go through a comment period from
>Congress.  At best, they won't be technically applicable even to federal
>entities until at least June of 2001. As far as libraries are concerned, we
>need to get an official legal opinion through appropriate channels.
>
>Section 508 may be a sign of things to come (let's support and work toward
>that bright time), but it's not there yet.  If, as we know, libraries are
>not yet compliant with the ADA and Section 504, which do apply to them, why
>ask them to wave the flag for or get excited about a statute that doesn't or
>might not?
>
>Let's use Section 508 as an example, a shining bellweather, when we talk
>about the bigger issue of accessibility.  Let's talk about vendor reaction
>and the companies that are jumping on the bandwagon. Let's not tell
>libraries that 508 definately applies to them.  To do so would be a very
>negative thing, with potentially devestating backlash and loss of
>credibility for all of us who advocate for access for all, including people
>with disabilities.
>
>Regards,
>Audrey
>
>
> >>> [log in to unmask] 01/02/01 15:55 PM >>>
>Dear Accessibility Advocates-Everyone:
>
>A happy, healthy, and thanks t the Access Board and the new
>Section 508, ACCESSIBLE New Year!
>
>Whatever meetings and sessions we attend at ALA Midwinter and
>elsewhere, the "Digital Divide" program included, let us
>celebrate the new Section 508 standards by making our slogan,
>chorus, and refrain that we "sing" proudly in unison:
>
>ACCESSIBILITY!
>
>- The need for accessibility is universal.  Everyone needs
>access, whether it be to healthcare, the local grocery store, the
>Post Office, a mode of transportation (especially after a 20-foot
>snowstorm), information, reading materials, or the Internet, etc.
>So everyone inherently personally relates, appreciates, and thus
>supports accessibility - when framed as "accessibility" in
>positive terms.
>
>- Accessibility is POSITIVE language at its finest. As Madison
>Avenue teaches us so well: Positive Language Sells. Positive
>Language Wins.*  Every Time.
>
>[*ex. The title of the successfully passed "Children's Internet
>Protection Act" - also an accessibility issue]
>
>- Accessibility puts us at the top of every [English-language]
>index, and through positive language, at the top of everyone's
>agenda.
>
>Ellen Perlow
>Chair, ALA ASCLA Century Scholarship Committee
>"Celebrating a New Century that Celebrates Diversity"
>http://www.ala.org/ascla/centuryscholarship.html
>Next Application Submission Deadline: March 1, 2001
>ALA 2001 Scholarship Application page:
>http://www.ala.org/work/awards/scholars.html
>Have YOU recruited/applied to be a Century Scholarship applicant today?
>----------------------------------------------------
>Manager of Information Services
>School of Library and Information Studies
>Texas Woman's University
>P.O. Box 425438
>Denton, TX 76204-5438
>Tel.: 940-898-2622  Fax: 940-898-2611
>Web: http://twu.edu/~s_perlow/
>E-Mail: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
September 2016
March 2016
January 2016
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
December 2014
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager