VICUG-L Archives

Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List

VICUG-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Altschul <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Peter Altschul <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:59:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
US Citizens Strike Back in Intelligence War 
============================================

Celeste Biever 19:00 08 October 03 Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition.

With the recent demise of the Bush administration's controversial Terrorist 
Information Awareness (TIA) programme to monitor everyone in the US, 
citizens now have a chance to get their own back. A website to be launched 
later in 2003 will allow people to post information about the activities of 
government organisations, officials and the judiciary.

The two MIT researchers behind the project face one serious problem: how to 
protect themselves against legal action should any of the postings prove 
false. The answer, they say, is to borrow a technique from the underground 
music-swapping community.

Instead of storing the data in one place, they plan to distribute it around 
the internet in a similar way to the notorious Napster software that got 
music file- sharing under way. Just like TIA, the new website, called 
Government Information Awareness (GIA), is designed to collect snippets of 
information to build a database that can later be searched to reveal 
patterns of suspicious behaviour.

It is based on a site that Chris Csikszentmihályi and Ryan McKinley of the 
Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Media Laboratory set up in July. 
That site encourages members of the public to post information about 
organisations, officials and politicians, such as their business links and 
the source of their campaign donations.

The original site was hosted on one of MIT's servers. But soon after the 
site was launched it had to be dramatically scaled back after being 
overwhelmed with traffic and because of legal worries. The researchers do 
not edit the content, and became worried that if any of the postings were 
malicious or untrue MIT could be held responsible.

Peer-to-peer

They hope that following the Napster approach will get them round this 
problem. Instead of storing the data on a single server, so-called 
peer-to-peer networks hold data in a number of locations around the 
internet, from where it can be downloaded directly.

This strategy thwarted the music industry's attempts to sue some of the 
groups that organise the swapping of digital music files. For the 
relaunched site, MIT will simply provide the facilities to post data and 
search for it. "It will be a sort of citizens' intelligence agency," says 
Csikszentmihályi.

"It's an interesting tactic in the battle for civil liberties,"

But whether MIT will be immune from legal action remains unclear. Some 
lawyers say that as long as the organisers do not edit the content, they 
cannot be held responsible for any libellous material.

Others are more cautious. "Whoever hosts something that is defamatory and 
untrue takes a risk," says Mike Godwin, technology adviser for the public 
interest group Public Knowledge in Washington DC. The researchers' strategy 
may minimise that risk, he says. "Peer-to-peer is probably the best way."



http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994246

Government Information Awareness: http://opengov.media.mit.edu/


VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask]  In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
 VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2