Well, that case was settled.  So lets move on to the present one.  We don't 
really have the FS side of the argument.  GW Micro claim that their 
implementation of place-markers in the latest Window-eyes beta etc. is 
different from - has nothing to do with - that (as set out in the suit) of 
FS in JAWS.  Why did FS pick place-markers as a particular instance?  Most 
JAWS users don't use them, anyway.  Who else sues in the blindness AT field? 
Who will FS's next target be, in a year or two from now?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Poehlman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: [VICUG-L] One AT Professional's Opinion RE: FS Vs. GW Micro


I take issue with the bullying notion.  fs was being deluged with support
requests for "freedon" box.


    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]


    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]