Here is an excellent overview on the smart credit card issue by Melissa
Allison, who reports on banking and financial services for the Chicago
Tribune. It separates the hype from the reality.
kelly
Chicago Tribune
NOT TAKING OFF
THE U.S. IS STILL NOT FULLY PREPARED FOR A NEW WAVE OF SMART CARDS
THAT MAJOR BANKS PLAN TO LAUNCH.
By Melissa Allison
Tribune Staff Writer
November 2, 2000
It has been a long time in the making.
For more than a decade, the U.S. banking industry has boasted that it
was going to give customers so-called smart cards--amazingly powerful
credit cards with computer chips to store everything from checking
account balances to health-care information.
France had done it, Germany had done it, the United Kingdom and parts
of Asia had done it.
Now, at last, smart cards have arrived in the United States.
American Express has blitzed the market with its hologram-stamped
"Blue" card, and three major banks are launching programs this fall to
promote Visa-developed smart cards. First USA, the credit card unit of
Chicago-based Bank One Corp., sent mailings this week hawking its new
First USA Smart Visa.
But the amazing powers part of the equation is lacking: Although smart
cards cost about $3 to produce, versus 25 cents for a traditional
magnetic-stripe card, the most exciting thing they do in the United
States, at least right now, is to make online shopping more secure.
"The reality is they don't do very much," said Robert McKinley, chief
executive of CardWeb.com, a Frederick, Md.-based firm that tracks the
payment card industry. "They're more of a marketing gimmick, a way for
these banks to appear cutting-edge."
The promise of a smart card is that it can be used in telephones,
vending machines, at department stores and drugstores; it's a card
that could track frequent-flier miles, act as a hotel room key and
store value for mass transit.
Smart cards are capable of that.
The problem is, very few places in the United States can read the chip
on a smart card.
Banks and merchants chose magnetic-stripe cards over the more
sophisticated smart cards in the 1980s and early 1990s because the
magnetic-stripe system was--and still is--less expensive. Besides the
lower cost of cards, the U.S. telephone system, over which information
contained on magnetic-stripe cards is transferred, is affordable, in
contrast to countries that have deployed a smart-card system.
Visa estimated in early 1999 that it would cost more than $11 billion
to convert the U.S. to a smart-card system.
So why offer smart cards here at all? In short, three reasons: the
growth of online shopping, the halving of smart-card manufacturing
costs and a recent Justice Department antitrust lawsuit that accuses
card giants Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard of stifling competition, in
part by hindering smart-card development. The judge has yet to
announce his verdict in that case.
Visa and MasterCard, which have more than 75 percent of the U.S. card
market, argued this summer that they had found no business case for
offering smart cards--with no apparent demand, the expense couldn't be
justified.
This fall, however, after American Express' smashing success with
Blue, they apparently found a case. Visa is pushing its new smart
card, and MasterCard officials say they are in smart-card discussions
with a number of large institutions. Both non-profits, which are owned
and run by banks, deny that their intensified efforts stem from the
antitrust litigation.
"The pursuit of a business case has driven us," said Diana Knox,
senior vice president in charge of smart-card applications at Visa
U.S.A.
Visa decided last year that to make smart cards work for its bank
members, the cards had to offer more than payment capabilities. And
they do: They come with card readers that attach to personal computers
to transmit data directly, making online shopping easier and more
secure.
The cards and readers also assure Internet merchants that consumers on
the other end of a transaction have a card in hand, which should
reduce fraud and payment disputes. That means merchants and banks save
money, Knox said.
But that's about all the new cards do that the traditional
magnetic-stripe cards cannot. In fact, U.S. smart cards carry magnetic
stripes to handle most transactions--the ones people make at
department and grocery stores.
Knox and industry observers say that smart-card capabilities in the
United States will expand quickly, and that eventually they will
overtake magnetic-stripe cards.
McKinley expects banks to enter an "applications war" in the next five
years, in which they will compete based on what their smart cards can
do. With these cards, banks can "provide a lot more value than they do
now," he said, predicting that the addition of new services will begin
early next year.
"The cards could be gateways to banking and credit, but also track
investments, insurance, frequent-flier information," McKinley said.
One hurdle: Merchants will have to acquire equipment to convert to the
smart-card system. Although consumer demand could drive the
transition, some experts say merchants will need other incentives.
In the meantime, McKinley said, issuers are trying to force the
migration to smart cards by getting them into people's hands.
Indeed, the cards tend to offer more perks than your average credit
card. They come with discounts and rewards programs, no annual fees
and free smart-card readers.
They also enjoy the intangible benefit of looking cool. At a time when
many cardholders showboat about the silver, gold or platinum qualities
of their cards, how could the sight of a technology-age microchip
hurt?
American Express has had little trouble convincing people to carry its
Blue card, which was so swamped with applications when it debuted last
fall that some people had to wait several weeks for their cards.
In the year since then, American Express has issued at least a million
Blue cards, and probably more like 2 million or 3 million, according
to industry watchers. Company officials will not disclose the figures.
"It far surpassed our expectations," said Judy Tenzer, an American
Express spokeswoman.
"Blue made everybody stand up and take notice."
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask] In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html
|