VICUG-L Archives

Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List

VICUG-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jamal Mazrui <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jamal Mazrui <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 May 1999 13:19:18 +0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (205 lines)
             Congressional Record dated Wednesday, April 28, 1999
                                 House Section
                   ----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
Remarks by EHRLICH (R-MD) on H.R. 1601: BLIND EMPOWERMENT ACT
         [CR page H-2454, 63 lines]

                  Attributed to EHRLICH (R-MD)

                              BLIND EMPOWERMENT ACT


    The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gentleman
  from Maryland (Mr. Ehrlich) is recognized for 5 minutes.

    Mr. EHRLICH. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to introduce the Blind Empowerment
  Act, which will impact the lives of nearly a quarter of a million blind
  people.

    The Blind Empowerment Act, Mr. Speaker, restores the long-standing linkage
  between blind people and senior citizens under the Social Security Act. This
  bipartisan legislation, which currently has over 230 cosponsors, will restore
  this historic link and empower blind people.

    For nearly 20 years, the blind and senior citizens were linked for purposes
  of the Social Security earnings test. Generally, the test has been a part of
  our Social Security program since its inception. The test reduces the
  benefits of recipients who earn above a certain amount of income from their
  work.

    In 1977, the Social Security amendments established the earnings limit for
  the blind who receive disability benefits. This exempt amount was linked to
  the identical exempt amount as applied to seniors 65 and over.

    In 1996, we did the right thing by raising the earnings limit for seniors
  from $11,500 to $30,000 by the year 2002. That was the Senior Citizens
  Freedom To Work Act. Giving seniors the opportunity to increase their
  earnings and keep their benefits was the right thing to do.

    During the process, however, this historic link between the blind and the
  seniors was ended, which aided in balancing the budget. As a result, by 2002,
  when the exemption for seniors becomes $30,000, the lower limit set by
  Congress for the blind will be half that amount.

    It is also important to note that when blind individuals earn more than the
  earnings limit threshold, they lose all of their benefits. The senior
  citizens in the same situation would only have their benefits reduced by a
  rate of $1 for every $3 earned over the limit.

    We should not roll back the progress of the last 2 decades by continuing a
  policy which discourages working individuals from becoming self-sufficient
  and making a contribution to their communities.

    It is my belief that "delinkage" occurred because our priorities in 1995
  were to rein in deficit spending and not to provide a disincentive to the
  working blind. The blind want to work and take pride in doing so.

    In an era of budget surplus, need for capable workers in a tight labor
  market, and a clear opportunity to demonstrate fairness and equity, it is
  time for Congress to restore this historic link. The increasing number of
  working blind Americans will produce additional tax revenue and contributions
  to the Federal Treasury and the Social Security Trust Fund.

    Approximately 70 percent of working-age blind people are underemployed or
  unemployed. Accordingly, blindness is often associated with adverse social
  and economic consequences. It is difficult for blind individuals to find
  sustained employment or, for that matter, employment at all.

                                    (Time) 2045


    This is especially good, common-sense legislation during this favorable
  economic time. When I listen to business owners back in my district, one
  thing they tell me is that their priority is to find and keep quality
  workers.

    Mr. Speaker, I urge this House, the rest of my colleagues in this House, to
  join me in sponsoring the Blind Empowerment Act. I am confident Congress will
  do the right thing and restore fairness and trust by reestablishing this
  historic link and return to the blind the vital economic freedom which will
  empower them to provide for themselves and their families and contribute to
  the health of this Nation.

----------
               H.R.1601 As introduced in the House, April 28, 1999
                   ----------------------------------------

                                                                              I
  106th CONGRESS
    1st Session
                                   H. R. 1601

  To amend title II of the Social Security Act to restore the link between the
      maximum amount of earnings by blind individuals permitted without
      demonstrating ability to engage in substantial gainful activity and the
      exempt amount permitted in determining excess earnings under the earnings
      test.


                         ------------------------------


                         IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
                                 April 28, 1999
  Mr. Ehrlich (for himself, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Cooksey, Mr. Larson, Mr. Watts of
      Oklahoma, Mrs. Northup, Mr. McIntosh, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Young
      of Alaska, Mr. Bereuter, Ms. Hooley of Oregon, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr.
      Wynn, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Weygand, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. Barrett of
      Wisconsin, Mr. Hall of Ohio, Mr. Horn, Mr. Traficant, Mr. Sanders, Mr.
      Salmon, Mr. Clement, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts,
      Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Towns, Mr. Shays, Mrs. Mink of Hawaii, Mr.
      Snyder, Mr. Berman, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Rothman, Mr.
      McNulty, Mr. Green of Texas, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Bentsen, Mr. Baldacci, Ms.
      DeLauro, Mr. Bishop, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr.
      Frost, Mr. Dixon, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Bonior,
      Mr. Underwood, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Romero-Barcelo, Mr. Stump, Mr. Taylor of
      North Carolina, Mr. Tierney, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Walsh, Mr.
      Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Gilchrest, Mrs. Morella, Mr. LaFalce, Ms.
      Slaughter, Mr. Costello, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Hobson, Mr. Fletcher, Mr.
      Kuykendall, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Clay, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. Woolsey, Mr.
      Dickey, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Watkins, Mr. Deutsch, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Coburn,
      Mr. Goodling, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Fattah, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr.
      Fossella, Mr. Brown of California, Mr. Baker, Ms. Danner, Mrs. Clayton,
      Mr. Tauzin, Mr. Stark, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Lampson, Mr. Borski,
      Mr. Payne, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. Coble, Mrs. Capps, Mr.
      Martinez, Mr. Murtha, Mr. Nussle, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Schaffer, Mr. Istook,
      Mr. Largent, Mr. Sawyer, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Watt of North Carolina, Mr.
      Talent, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Vento, Mr. Lucas of Oklahoma, Mr. Baird, Mr.
      Kind, Mr. Wise, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Cramer, Mr.
      Boswell, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Ms. Brown of
      Florida, Mr. Bliley, Mr. Filner, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode
      Island, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Klink, Mr. Kanjorski, Mr. Oxley, Mr. Pastor,
      Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Davis of Virginia, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Spence,
      Mr. Rush, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Allen, Ms. Carson, Mr. Holden, Mr. Terry, Mrs.
      Jones of Ohio, Mr. Burr of North Carolina, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Strickland,
      Mr. Sessions, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Gejdenson, Mr. McGovern, Mr.
      Pascrell, Mr. Ney, Mr. Hilliard, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Sununu,
      Mr. Hansen, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Coyne, Mr. Barrett of Nebraska, Mr. Lewis of
      Kentucky, Mr. Shows, Mr. Visclosky, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Leach, Mr. Burton of
      Indiana, Mr. Dicks, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. Hutchinson, Ms. Kaptur,
      Mr. Cook, Mr. Spratt, Mr. Regula, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mr.
      Cummings, Mr. Nethercutt, Mr. Latham, Mr. Farr of California, Mr. John,
      Mr. Olver, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Whitfield, Mr.
      Brown of Ohio, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Clyburn, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Gilman, Mr.
      Moran of Virginia, Mr. King, Mrs. Chenoweth, Mr. Sabo, Mr. Thornberry,
      Mrs. Emerson, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Chabot, Mr.
      Rahall, Mr. Dooley of California, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Minge, Mr. Inslee, Mr.
      Kucinich, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Foley, Mr. Scott, Mr. Gary Miller of California,
      Mr. Ganske, Ms. Granger, Ms. McCarthy of Missouri, Mr. Jefferson, Mr.
      Norwood, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Hoeffel,
      Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Gillmor, Mr. Maloney of Connecticut, Mr.
      Weiner, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Moore, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Roemer, Mr.
      Davis of Illinois, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Berry, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Quinn,
      Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Simpson, and Mr. Condit) introduced the following bill;
      which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means


                         ------------------------------


                                     A BILL
  To amend title II of the Social Security Act to restore the link between the
      maximum amount of earnings by blind individuals permitted without
      demonstrating ability to engage in substantial gainful activity and the
      exempt amount permitted in determining excess earnings under the earnings
      test.

                          ==============================


      Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
  States of America in Congress assembled,


  SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF LINK BETWEEN RULES RELATING TO SUBSTANTIAL GAINFUL
      ACTIVITY FOR BLIND INDIVIDUALS AND RULES RELATING TO EXCESS EARNINGS
      UNDER THE EARNINGS TEST.

      Section 223(d)(4)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423(d)(4)(A))
  is amended by striking "No individual who is blind" and all that follows
  through "had not been enacted." and inserting "No individual who is blind
  shall be regarded as having demonstrated an ability to engage in substantial
  gainful activity on the basis of earnings that do not exceed an amount equal
  to the exempt amount under section 203(f)(8) which is applicable to
  individuals described in subparagraph (D) thereof.".


  SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

      The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to taxable years
  ending after 1995.

----------
End of Document


VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask]  In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
 VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2