I have been working hard on "Analysis, Terminable and Interminable" where
I think we may regard where from the two schools, France and USA (self)had
their common beggining.

 One took the concentration on a educational aproach for psychoanalysis, where
one subject could find a therapeutic way to re-ocupy his/her place into society
and that could repair the tremendous consequences of trauma.

 The other one, after Lacan, of course, took the never ending formation of
what we call subjectivity, where from Deleuze took the basis for his work,
by the way a real good one.

 I think both understood very well what Freud left to be questioned and to
be worked on and I do admire both, because we cannot deny that although all
psychoanalytic efforts, humanity still do not discovered that Death is always
ahead, as a general destination, in order to think about Nature's importance
and Psychoanalysis as something that may help to educate people to face with
dignity this human limit.

 By the way, I am still receiving answers for the three questions I sent to the
List.Thanks.

 Osmar, [log in to unmask]

1- "Can the analysand( pacient, partner,,,)have conditions to know when s/he
wants to stop his analytic work?"

 2- "Once an analysand stopped analysis, are there any technical reasons in
order that if s/he wants to restart it with another psychoanalyst all the
progress he may have had before may be lost?"

 3- "If one analysand decides to use Psychoanalytic Support through Internet
resources could we admit s/he is still into psychoanalitic work, why?"