CC to [log in to unmask]
Un exemple de “psychanalyse et science” en anglais :

My dear colleagues

   following
   http://www.egroups.com/message/akhnaton/1072
>If we look at the Bible (considered as Egyptological data)
>we know little about Moses’ father. What we know is
>that Moses had killed a man, an Egyptian, in a quarries;
>it has been the major cause in his fate - and now we
>have this poor ‘May’ reported by Urhekau’s
>http://www.egroups.com/message/akhnaton/1063

   The Egyptologist M.Luban writes in
   http://www.egroups.com/message/akhnaton/1075
>Yes.  I believe the quarries are the place to search for
>Moses.  Manetho says so, doesn't he?  I elaborate on all
>this in my article "The Etymology of the Name of Moses"
>(I am hoping to have it published).  Either way, I will
>show it to this group one day soon.

   While a psychoanalyst wonder (in PSYCHOAN@)
>Why would one experience  theorizing as "dangerous?"
>That would be a psychoanalytic question.

   and another one answers (in PSYCHOAN@):
>E =3D mc2 turned out to be a pretty dangerous idea. There
>is a difference between the truth of a theory and the uses to
>which it is put in social reality.


My point
   E=mc2 has been dangerous insofar psychoanalysts failed with their service
to collective psychology - see Freud warning:
http://www.dnafoundation.com/regis/cd174/apa/APPIX01.HTM

   Now there is another equation in question: AMO=HT3
   Are we going to << bridged the gap between individual and mass psychology
>> this time?



--------------------------------------------
               Dr. William  Theaux
--------------------------------------------