PSYCHOAN Archives

Psychoanalysis

PSYCHOAN@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ciprian Cioiulescu <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Psychoanalysis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 May 1998 16:42:46 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Well, to answer to some questions, I'd say that I'd aware of the fact that
my action (of missing twice) triggered my analyst's reaction. Nevertheless
her reaction was not a fair one ... it would have been perfectly fair if I
would have been warned about the consequences that such an action from my
part could have had.
    I don't see how my vulnerability has anything to do with this, unless
the analyst's reaction can be seen as part of the therapy.
    Anyway, I posted this message in order to find out how other analysts
see such a problem.

Best ragards,
CIP

ATOM RSS1 RSS2