PSYCHOAN Archives

Psychoanalysis

PSYCHOAN@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jean Fitzpatrick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Psychoanalysis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 May 2001 08:43:13 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Go to www.naap.org for info on requirements for lay analysts.

Jean Fitzpatrick
-------------------------------------------------------
Jean G. Fitzpatrick, N.C.Psy.A.
email:  [log in to unmask]
website:  http://www.pastoralcounseling.net
a columnist for Beliefnet http://www.beliefnet.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Maxwell Young" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: Legal status of PA


> My understanding is that until fairly recently one could only become
> clinically practicing  member of the American Psychoanalytic
> Association if one had a medical qualification. However, this was
> sucessfully challenged in a legal action by clinical psychologists.
> Now people regularly become APsaA psychoanalysts at a number of APsaA
> centres throughout the country. In addition, there were then and are
> now other organizations where people who were not physicians could
> train to become a psychoanalyst, e.g., the National Psychological
> Association for Psychoanalysis - http://www.npap.org - which was
> founded to cater for and train non-medical practitioners who call
> themselves psychoanalysts. There is also a Section 39 of the American
> Psychological Association for people who practice or are interested
> in psychoanalysis.
> It is my impression that in America (unlike Britain where its
> exclusive use by members of the British Psychoanalytic Society is
> currently under challenge) the term is not particularly rigidly
> confined to people who have had full psychoanalytic trainings. I
> think people are referred to as doing psychoanalysis who actually do
> psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Indeed, the practice of most pukka
> psychoanalysts nowadays involves lots of psychoanalytic
> psychotherapy. Lacanians freely use the term psychoanalyst to
> describe themselves worldwide.
> The distinction between psychoanalysis ands psychoanalytic
> psychotherapy is not clearly drawn, but it usually means 4-5 sessions
> of 50 mins per week for psychoanalysis and less for psychoanalytic
> psychotherapy. However, I have heard of a US trainng which produces
> graduates who have had and have given one session per week, but this
> is a very unusual situation.
> You will see that all of these categorizations are much-disputed in
> some quarters.
>
> Best, Bob
>
> >Can anyone tell me if it is legal in the U.S. for people other than
> >physicians to practice psychoanalysis, and if so, what are the
> >qualifications for such a practice.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >           Larry D. Lyons
> >           [log in to unmask]
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
> Robert Maxwell Young, Prof. Emeritus of Psychotherapy & Psychoanalytic
Studies,
> Centre for Psychotherapeutic Studies, Univ. of Sheffield,
> http://www.shef.ac.uk/~psysc/
> Co-Director, Bulgarian Institute of Human Relations & Honoured Prof.,
> New Bulgarian Univ., Sofia. http://www.nbu.bg/bihr/psy.htm
> Home: 26 Freegrove Rd., London N7 9RQ. tel. +44 207 607 8306
> Private Practice, Consultation, Supervision
> Web Site & Writings  http://www.human-nature.com
> [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
> One must imagine Sisyphus happy.' - Camus
> P;ease put 'Message for Robert Young' in the Subject line.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2