Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.

Subject:	Re: Win XP
From:	Ultra <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Tue, 1 Jan 2002 16:29:49 +1100
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (25 lines)

So far from what I experienced, I either dislike/like XP. for old hardware,
XP is really simple, everything should have build-in driver support, and PnP
in XP is much better than before, but from few friends and my own personal
use, we've found win2k is still better, faster, even with all fancy/useless
features disabled, we still found win2k is faster.

Anyway, XP is good for new computer users, I mean no offensive, for people
who don't know what to do with win2k, XP is better way to go. I personaly
like win2k's management.

If anyone goes XP, consider XP pro as your OS, XP home edition does not
worth it.

Jun Qian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Shkabara" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [PCSOFT] Win XP

                Curious about the people moderating your
                   messages? Visit our staff web site:
                    http://freepctech.com/staff.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG