Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.
Subject:
From:
Joe Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:19:06 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
> > I zipped a file which after zipping was too large
> > for my 5 1/4" disk.
> > I rezipped the zipped file and it fit.
> > Will this work?
> > Herb Chadnow
> >

As you know from other replies there are different levels of compression.
Maximum compression is the slowest but isn't really very slow. However, once
you've compressed it to maximum, if you zip it again it will get larger (by
a few bytes or 1% or so), because there is no longer any redundancy in the
file to compress. the same applies if you try to zip a jpeg file. The image
part of this is already compressed and you find the zipped version is not
much smaller (only the image headers get compressed I suppose).

In your case the first zip operation must not have been maximum compression.
The best results would be to zip again from the *original* files, with
maximum compression set.

Joe

        The NOSPIN Group provides a monthly newsletter with great
       tips, information and ideas: NOSPIN-L, The NOSPIN Magazine
             Visit our web site to signup: http://nospin.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV