In the case of SystemWorks, I believe the 2003 antivirus section checks
for more elements than 2002. I don't know about 2004. By this I do not
mean virus signatures, I mean it checks for new types of intrusion that
have surfaced since the release of 2002. Oh, when will it all end. If
Bill Gate$ can stop SPAM in 2 years as promised he deserves a medal.
Orf Bartrop
Ian wrote:
>No problems. Which is precisely why I stick with that version of ZAP.
>
>Many people think that later versions of software must be better than earlier versions. In my experience this is not necessarily true. But it certainly enables software manufacturers to shift more product.
>
>So, unless a later, 'improved' version of a program contains upgrades that will address some specific shortcoming, I stick to the version that works properly, behaves itself, and does as it's told.
>
>Ian Porter
>Computer Guys Inc.
>Arrowtown
>New Zealand
>[log in to unmask]
>
>The NOSPIN Group
>http://freepctech.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Betti Ann & Preston Smith
> Subject: Re: [PCSOFT] Norton Systemworks 2004 and Pro version
>
>
> Ian!
>
> I amusing ZAP 4.5.538.000 plus all of the most recent versions. I have had
> no problems at all. What is the problem that causes you to stay with an
> earlier version?
>
> Preston
>
> At 03:18 AM 1/23/2004, you wrote:
> >Yep, AVG and Zone Alarm Pro are a good combo. I haven't experienced any
> >problems with recent versions of ZAP as I just carry on using my trusty
> >4.0.123.012 version, which I always set to prevent it from upgrading itself.
>
> "Hold No Punches.." Rode brings you great shareware/freeware
> programs with his honest opinions in this weekly column.
> http://freepctech.com/rode
>
>
>
PCSOFT maintains many useful files for download
visit our download web page at:
http://freepctech.com/downloads.shtml
|
