Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.

Subject:	Re: Which Format?
From:	Dean Kiley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 20 Aug 2003 04:46:27 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (32 lines)

My apologies for not being as descriptive as Paul. I guess, in addition, I
would add that MP3 format seems to be the best way of storing music files.
Programs like Nero, Roxio and others will read and transfer the files back
to .WAV at whatever bitrate you wish. Usually, I save music at around
128kps, and that is mainly for size purposes since my storage is a 20gb hdd.
I understand that over 160kps is "near CD quality", so if (to coin a phrase)
size doesn't matter, the higher the bitrate, the better.

My apologies to "Inpersuit" for misreading the question. I'll try to pay
closer attention in the future.

HTH

Dean Kiley

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul A. Shippert" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: [PCSOFT] Which Format?


> Greetings list--
>
> I agree with Dean's suggestion, if the CD Audio format is not available.
> It should be kept in mind that, even with today's frequency of sampling,
> CD is already a compromise.

             Do you want to signoff PCSOFT or just change to
                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
                   http://freepctech.com/pcsoft.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG