I didn't find the details in a quick search, but I know that there is still
a limit on the number of total characters that can be used for naming all
the files (maybe in the root directory?).  Maybe this will jog someone's
memory to get the details of this limit.  I remember reading that the space
allocated for something (maybe FAT entries in root?) limited this total
number of characters in Win 95 like the limit imposed in DOS for the number
of files allowed in the root directory.

Someone else remember more info????

At 4/21/98 12:09 PM , Richard Ekpat, M.D. wrote:
>While trying to move a message from OE98 to a floppy drive I got the
>following error message:
>
>"Out of memory or system resources. Close some windows or programs and try
>again."
>snip>
>My computer knowledge is very elementary, but out of a hunch I decided to
>rename the file to a much shorter name and try again, and presto! I
>succeeded. (The original file name was almost a sentence).
>snip>
>My questions are these:
>(a) Why should a very long file name lead to such an error message when my
>system memory and resources were more than adequate (I guess) ?

Doug Simmons
WWW Pager: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/2402199
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++