Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.

Subject:	Re: Windows RAM Limit
From:	Peter Shkabara <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Fri, 5 May 2000 21:37:35 -0700
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (29 lines)

Actually, the CPU does have a limit on the amount of RAM that it can handle.
It is just that, with modern CPUs, we can't afford that much ram!

I have read some articles indicating that Win95 (also Win98?) max out at
64MB of RAM - that installing more than that may actually slow operation. I
have not verified that myself, but in using NT and now Win2k, I find that
performance seems to peak at about 128MB. My current system has 256MB, but I
saw no improvement from the extra 128MB. Of course, if the application is a
server machine, you may well need more RAM.

Peter Shkabara
_______________________________
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
http://pesh.what.cc

-----Original Message-----
I know that there is no limit to the amount of RAM you can put
in a Windows 95/98/2000 PC, but I've heard that Windows can't use more
than 256 KB, no matter what you do.  Any opinions?

Correction:
Yes.  Yes.  I meant megabytes, not kilobytes.  Sorry.  Slip of the
fingers.

         The NOSPIN Group Promotions is now offering the NOSPIN
        File Download CD, Abit's Gentus Linux, Linux Power CD and
          the RedHat Linux CD.  All CDs are provided at COST!!!
                      http://nospin.com/promotions

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG