Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 02:56:42 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
On 16 Nov 2001, at 11:49, Tony Beckett wrote:

> It took 3hrs 11mins to transfer 116 Mbytes of data. I realise the
> serial ports are not fast but should it really take that long? Have
> I missed something here?

  191, call it 200 minutes for 116, call it 100 MB, or about 500 KB /
minute.  Let's call it 600 KB / minute or 10 KB / second.

  Since a byte, transmitted serially, typically takes 10 bits, this
is roughly 100 Kbps, or about twice the speed of a 56 Kbps dial-up
and close to the 115 Kbps which is the maximum supported by many
serial port hardware chips.  (Some may support 230 Kbps, but you'd
need that support on both ends to work, even if the software allows
it....)

  Okay, let's do the detail:

(116,000,000x10)/(191x60) = 1160000000/11460

  = 101221.6

or about 90% of the theoretical maximum for a common asynchronous
serial port.  LAN speeds start at about 10x that fast.

Dave Gillett

             PCSOFT maintains many useful files for download
                     visit our download web page at:
                  http://freepctech.com/downloads.shtml

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV