Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.
Subject:
From:
Dale Bryant <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCSOFT - PC software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Mar 1998 16:57:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
I think everything runs a little faster.  I rarely encounter errors.  The
best thing that I've discovered so far is that the FAT32 conversion works
flawlessly, and quick.  My C: drive went from 207 MB available to 583 MB.
The D: drive went from 200 MB to 298.  No complaints here except that I
think that beta users of Windows 98 should get a discount toward the
purchase of the full package when available.  $37 is a little steep just to
TRY something out.

Dale Bryant
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----


><<SNIP>>
>>Is there a clarification of the "expires in December 1998" >statement?
>
>
>Yup, I have the Win98 Consumer Preview (Beta 3).  The documentation that
>comes with it says that Windows will not boot after December 31, 1998.  I
>will therefore need to upgrade to a full version of Win98.
>
>Does anyone else agree that loading web pages seems to be much faster with
>Win98?  I seem to notice an incredible difference.

>Windows98 seems to be trying to take up the slack for less knowledable
>computer users, by allowing them to schedule routine maintenance such as
>defrag, scandisk, etc.  You can use single-click interface, etc. but it is
>not standard, nor necessary.  Win98 hereby gets my vote.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV