Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.

Subject:	Re: Paths in Autoexec.bat
From:	Demetri Kolokotronis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Sat, 20 May 2000 12:30:43 -0400
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (31 lines)

On Sun, 21 May 2000 00:08:09 +1000 don penlington
<[log in to unmask]> writes:
> Demetri writes:
>
> "I deleted all path lines in my autoexec.bat in Win.98se (making a
> backup), and do not notice any deterioration in performance. Any
> reason these paths should stay?"
>
>
> Autoexec.bat is an anachronism, a redundant throwback to Win 3.1,
> and may generally be removed altogether...
>
> Best thing is to relegate them both to the Recycle Bin for a week or
> two to ensure that nothing is going to miss them.  Or, if you feel
uneasy
> about that, renaming them has same effect.
>
> Don Penlington

Knowing that my Win98 does not need autoexcec.bat is the reason I deleted
paths. Programs I installed inserted paths in autoexec.bat. (These were
Windows, and not DOS programs.) Question is whether I needed these paths
programs installed. As I stated, computer seems to get along without
them.

Demetri Kolokotronis

             PCSOFT maintains many useful files for download
                     visit our download web page at:
                     http://nospin.com/pc/files.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG