Error - template LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the LAYOUT-DATA-WRAPPER template could not be found.

Error - template STYLE-SHEET not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the STYLE-SHEET template could not be found.

Error - template SUB-TOP-BANNER not found

A configuration error was detected in the CGI script; the SUB-TOP-BANNER template could not be found.

Subject:	Re: IE Image Proglems (second try)
From:	Rick Glazier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	PCSOFT - Personal Computer software discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:49:11 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (26 lines)

Sounds like a problem with the way Juno, AOL, (and NetZero among others),
are trying to speed up surfing speeds by compressing the "things" they send
you "on" (as part of) WEB pages.  This compression is "supposed to be"
*on the fly* and invisible...

I would check the options (or settings) for both ISPs and look for anything that
seems to be about "speed" (or faster), or of course a direct reference to graphic
quality...  Just a thought, as I do not use either ISP...

                                                      Rick  Glazier

----- Original Message -----
From: "cfinnigan" <[log in to unmask]>


> on a windows 98se machine with IE 5.5 (i think, maybe 6), the images look
> pixelated or blurry, like when the display properties are set to 256 or less
> colors. they are actually set to 16 million. images opened in other programs
> are
> fine, it's just an IE problem. what setting am i missing or what could be
> wrong? ISP's are Juno and AOL. Internet images are bad in both programs.

                         PCSOFT's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG