PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steven Ables <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Dec 1998 20:18:37 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Had he bought a standard Celeron this would indeed be the case, but the 300A
is an "upgraded" version with built in cache that performs much better than
the original Celerons. I have a 300A overclocked to 450mhz and it
outperforms my PII 400mhz by about 10-12% in various benchmark test. Would
have never bought the PII had I known I could have bought a 300A for about
$90. Oh well, live and learn, eh ?

Steven
-----Original Message-----
From: Brent Reynolds <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, December 14, 1998 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] Can I Run 300A Without Fan/Too much thermal compound?


>A Celleron CPU?  Yep, you made a mistake.  You got a chip that performs
>worse than Intel's regular Pentium 233 with no cache, or less cache, and a
>worse math unit than a regular Pentium II that wouldn't have cost you much
>if any more

            PCBUILD maintains many useful files for download
              on our web site - visit our download page at:
                     http://nospin.com/pc/files.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2