PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:43:23 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines)
David, thanks for that.  To recap then, you're saying that even though there
may be no visible dirt or gunk anywhere in the 'ball pit', it's possible
that the light-admitting slits may be partly obscured?  I take it these
slits are not immediately visible when the ball is removed?

Ian Porter
Computer Guys
Arrowtown
New Zealand
[log in to unmask]

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gillett" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] Derailed mice


> On 23 Apr 2002, at 21:19, Ian wrote:
>
> > Anyone know why mice go bad?
>
> > I don't mean dirt in the mechanism, I mean the jerky, patchy
> > behaviours that some mice begin to exhibit after varying periods of
> > time.
>
> > Sure, I know that a busy CPU can affect them too, but I've seen
> > this flakiness occur when nothing has been running, background or
> > otherwise. Like yesterday.  Went to fix an email problem for a
> > customer and she had a crazy mouse. Looked inside - no dirt.
> > Checked the connection - no probs. But the mouse still wouldn't
> > behave.
>
> > Sold her a new mouse - voila!  No problems - customer over the
> > moon.  Thinks I'm brilliant.
>
> > Well....I can't be.  Cos I can't tell her why the first one
> > crapped out.
> >
> > Ian Porter
> > Computer Guys
> > Arrowtown
> > New Zealand
> > [log in to unmask]
>
>
>   Well, there ARE two places where dirt in the works could induce
> "patchy behaviour" in a typical mouse:
>
> 1.  The most common scenario I've seen is a build-up of "gunk" on the
> rollers, around the point where the ball touches them.  This can lead
> to a loss of friction between the mouse and the rollers -- the mouse
> moves, the ball rolls, and the rollers don't.
>
> 2.  Each roller is attached to a wheel with slits in it, which passes
> between a tiny light source and a photoreceptor.  If dirt blocks the
> slits, the ball rolls, the roller turns, and the photoreceptor
> doesn't notice.
>
>
>   The ball is pressed slightly against the two sensor rollers by a
> sprung third roller, set at a 45-degree angle.  I HAVE seen one mouse
> where the spring for this third roller was not up to snuff, with the
> result that when the mouse was moved suddenly in certain directions,
> it could lose contact with one or both of the sensor rollers.  That
> would be a non-dirt loss of friction, and might be another cause for
> the problem you've described.
>
>   (I've also had one cheap mouse where the microswitch under the
> primary mouse button eventually wore out, but that didn't affect
> movement of the cursor, so I'm pretty sure that's a different
> problem.)
>
> David Gillett

                  Visit our website regularly for FAQs,
               articles, how-to's, tech tips and much more
                          http://freepctech.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2