PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Rode <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:53:39 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>
>Also, if memory serves, there was a way on some VX boards to increase the L3
>cache to support more memory caching.  Getting ahold of the cache RAM to do
>this might be a bit of a trick at this stage of the game, though.  Good
>luck!
>
>Kyle Elmblade
>[log in to unmask]

I think you are thinking of the early HX boards.  For those with a single
32kb X 8kb tag chip then the cacheable range was the first 64Mb of memory.
However you could add another tag ram chip which would increase the
cacheable range to 512Mb of RAM. Many earlier HX boards also used COAST
modules for L2 Cache that were upgradable and came in 256 or 512kb sizes.
Back then 64 Mb of RAM was considered a LOT of RAM.

I remember when I purchased my first HX board ...a Tyan Tomcat I. I ordered
it with a  256K COAST module and 48 megs of EDO. I paid something like 300
to 400 dollars for the RAM !

Mark Rode
The NOSPIN Group

                Curious about the people moderating your
                   messages? Visit our staff web site:
                     http://nospin.com/pc/staff.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2