PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Meagher <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Mar 1999 00:10:01 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
Well I think we have all dialoged this one to pieces.  I suppose that at
some point we should have changed the topic from "PCI or ISA" to "WinModem
or not WinModem" (apologies to the original poster for stealing your topic
<sheepish grin>).

I haven't done any counting or any other kind of scientific analysis, but
my perception is that the overwhelming majority of comments have been very
positive for WinModems.  And every one of those positive comments have
included the phrase "I have such-n-such brand of winmodem and....." (or
something very similar).

Except for a couple or three gamers (who have a valid problem), most of
those making negative comments seem to be expressing opinions or are
requoting statements that were made waaaaay back in the early days of
winmodems but are no longer relevant.

Now don't mistake me for the champion/spokesman for the winmodem industry.
I'm not!  As an engineer, I am appalled that one of my brethren would
design a product that is neither self-reliant nor self-sufficient.

Jim Meagher
=====
Micro Solutions Consulting        Member of The HTML Writers Guild
http://www.ezy.net/~microsol     International Webmasters Association
410-543-8996                MS Site Builder Network - Level 2 member
=====
-----Original Message-----
From: Herbert Graf <[log in to unmask]>


>--
>
>On Wed, 17 Mar 1999 09:40:10   Jim Meagher wrote:
>>Bob,
>>
>>I heartily agree with Dennis.  I have seen acceptable performance with
>>non-MMX 166 CPUs, so your PPro200 should have no problems.
>>
>>As I have said in the past, you (anyone) can prove to yourself the
"fact"
>>or fable behind the infamous "CPU hit" problem of winmodems......
>>
>>Install the modem, connect to the net, then load the SYSTEM MONITOR (in
>>your accessories/system tools folder) and look at the CPU usage chart.
>>As a comparison, check the CPU usage with your current modem first.
>
>     Although performance is always of top concern, with winmodems there
is another big concern, at least for me, drivers. Winmodems use very low
hardware drivers that have to have access to the whole machine at times.
The problem is if you use a winmodem you are at the mercy of the driver
manufacturer as far as stability goes. I agree, winmodems do not pose
much, if any, performance hit, but if my machine crashes more often than
it does now what good is it? Over the years drivers HAVE gotten to the
point where even I trust them, as long as it is from a good company, I
would be wary of a company I've never heard of. Just my opinion. TTYL
>
>
>-----== Sent via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==-----
>http://www.dejanews.com/  Easy access to 50,000+ discussion forums
>
>            Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
>                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
>                    http://nospin.com/pc/pcbuild.html
>

         The PCBUILD web site always needs good submissions.  If
          you would like to contribute to the website, send any
               hardware tech tips or hardware reviews to:
                           [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2