PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Rode <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 10 Oct 1999 12:26:09 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
 >Another reason why you would want to do that is the IDE
 >channels only operate as fast as the slowest device on that
 >channel. By having the old slower HD with the fast new HD you
 >limit the speed to the old HD's, and negate any faster speed on the
 >new one.
 >Dale Laluk / [log in to unmask]

This had validity a very long time ago when IDE devices and their on board
controllers were new technology. However this has not been true for many
many years. Modern IDE controllers ...since Win95 and earlier....have no
problem making distinctions between IDE mode types. and with a modern
controller you can mix any IDE devices on a channel without regard for mode
type or age of the device.

m

               PCBUILD mailing list is brought to you by:
                            The NOSPIN Group
                  http://nospin.com - http://nospin.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2