PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Twin*.*Star" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Mar 1999 14:20:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Just a side note. Not familiar with you particular mobo but I suspect, since
only a few most recent mobos do, that your mobo will only cache up to 64 Mb.
So actually adding more memory will cause you to take a 10 ~ 15% performance
it. The reason for this is that Win9x loads its system from top down and
therefor will be located in the uncached area of RAM. Since this is the most
used "software", it will actually slow the performance down. The only reason
I would think one would want more than 64 MB on a mobo that does not cache
above that is if you are loading veerrrry large files, e.g. 80Mb graphics
file, which would then be able to load into RAM and not have to access the
hard drive constantly while working on it.

How do you now if it caches more than 64 or what ever. Ask the mobo
manufacturer.

Daniel Wysocki
Twin*.*Star Computers
770-498-2582 /800-816-0663
[log in to unmask]
Fast - Reliable - Wallet Friendly
-----Original Message-----
From: bdecker <[log in to unmask]>


>Could anyone point me in the right direction for information on getting
full
>128 MB memory usage in my system?  Mbrd is an Intel 440FX, Pentium Pro
200.,
>specs says it supports up to 250 MB DRAM using stndrd 72 pin SIMMS

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                        Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2