Richard

When you say the machine was a bear to setup, what exactly do you mean?  I
have been setting up AMDK6-300 and K6-2 350 machines recently, and have
begun to question my abilities.  I have had numerous setup problems, [from
Windows 95 unable to deal with the 350mhz chip to memory conflicts.]  These
problems are in part the reason for my question.

Mike Buraczewski
[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Richard T. <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] AMD K6-2 vs Celeron A


>Mike:
>         Although I've not dealt with the Celeron 366, I've got to tell you
that
>the AMD K6-3 350 is an awesome, surprising chip.I've got one mounted in an
Asus
>5a super 7 board, with 64 megs of pc 100, ATI rage AGP card, a decent
soundcard
>and an isa modem and I could not be more satisfied, This particular machine
was
>a bear to set up, but now that it's perfect, I'm really pleased with the
>performance. Great for games as well as" normal "stuff. Unless you're
intending
>to Overclock, the super 7 setup gives a lot of bang for your buck.
>We're going to be curious about what you eventually go with!
>Rich Tabas
>Philly.Pa
>
>Mike Buraczewski wrote:
>
>>
>> Given an AMD K6-2 350 Mhz processor and an Intel Celeron(A) 366 Mhz
>> processor (either slot 1 or socket 370) which processor is better and
Why?.
>
>            Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
>                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
>                    http://nospin.com/pc/pcbuild.html
>

            Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
                    http://nospin.com/pc/pcbuild.html