PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Earl Truss <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Feb 1999 07:26:59 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
At 08:59 PM 2/22/99 -0600, you wrote:
>>   Bank 0     Bank 1      Bank 2       Bank 3     Total
>>  16M x 9      None      16M x 36       None      128MB

>appears that parity memory is required.

The requirement for parity memory comes from the "x 36" in the above.  If
non-parity memory was OK, it would say "x 32" instead.  The above looks
like a mistake to me.  I don't see how you could get 128MB without using a
64MB SIMM in bank 2/3.

>I've never heard the term before, but it appears that 'double banked'
>means that each 72 pin SIMM slot comprises two banks instead of one,
>thus 0/1, 2/3.  Anybody have a clearer explanation?       HTH

I had a similar motherboard at one time.  From what I could find out,
"single-banked" meant 1x4MB SIMMs.  It would not accept "double-banked"
(2x8MB or 4x16MB SIMMs) which are found today.  What exactly the one or two
refers to, I'm not sure.  Memory of the kind needed for this motherboard
may be hard to find and more expensive than more common memory since you
would need 16MB 30-pin SIMMs, which I've heard of but never seen, and
parity 72-pin SIMMs.

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                        Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2