PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 May 1999 17:36:17 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On 22 May 99, at 23:08, Babak Aghaei wrote:

> 2.If you think there is no way to get rid of the think there is no way
> to get rid of the case and the only
> solution is repatitioning the HDD, what is your recommended way to
> have the full capacity of the drive and Win98, Win95, Win NT and
> Linux OSs simultaniously on it?

  I don't think this can be done.  I believe all of these OSes can boot from
a FAT16 partition, but NT's boot loader is the only one I know of where two
OSes can boot from the same FAT16 partition.  So we have three FAT16
partiions of a maximum of 2GB each.  Add a boot manager (I use the one from
OS/2 that comes with Partiction Magic 3.x and 4.x), with its own tiny
partition; we've now used 6MB and a wee bit, all of which *must* be bfore
cylinder 1024 (8GB, with LBA).
  Whoops.  Our partition table has room for FOUR entries, and is now full.
The remaining 4GB or so of space cannot be made accessible, since we cannot
create additional partitions on this drive.

  I would put Linux on its own machine....

David G

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                        Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2