PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Eisenstadt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Feb 1999 11:38:35 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
I can report that on the actual m/b, the 4 1Mb 30-pin SIMMs
have 9 boxes on the modules which I believe indicates
parity modules; the 16Mb 72-pin SIMM, however, has 8 boxes
on the module indicating non-parity.  And the manual says
nothing about parity chips being required.

Earl Truss wrote:

> I had a similar motherboard at one time.  From what I could find out,
> "single-banked" meant 1x4MB SIMMs.  It would not accept "double-banked"
> (2x8MB or 4x16MB SIMMs) which are found today.  What exactly the one or two
> refers to, I'm not sure.  Memory of the kind needed for this motherboard
> may be hard to find and more expensive than more common memory since you
> would need 16MB 30-pin SIMMs, which I've heard of but never seen, and
> parity 72-pin SIMMs.

Both parity and non-parity 30-pin and 72-pin FPM SIMMs are available
from:

http://www.memoryx.com/generic.htm

but, as you say, are too pricey for serious consideration.  Short of
getting ahold of a 64Mb 72-pin SIMM and trying it out in the m/b, I
fear I will never get to the bottom of this.

Many thanks in any case to the amiable subscribers of pcbuild for
trying to solve this puzzle.

Michael Eisenstadt

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                        Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2