PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"SurplusMachinery.com" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Mar 1998 13:02:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
>I think I have seen explanation before, but I don't remember the details.
>I bought a 9.1GB drive and according to the specification it's 9.1GB
>formatted. But, after I formatted it, it showed up as only around 8.5GB. Do
>HD manufacturers use different scale system than most OSs (e.g., divided by
>1000 instead of 1024 so their numbers are always bigger than the actual
>number shown on our system)? Why do they continue to do that if I rember
>the reason correctly? >Any explanations on this?
>
>
There maybe a more technical explaination, but I think its similar to the
reason Intel used DX4 rather than DX3  and used 100 instead of 99 for the
DX4/100mhz chip.....Marketing....it sounds bigger & better.....

David Olds

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                        Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2