PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Feb 1999 13:53:51 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On 1 Feb 99, at 8:13, David Nasser wrote:

> In general, risc processors require _more_ instruction cycles
> (because the instructions, on average, are more fundamental) to run
> an application, but execute the individual instructions more quickly.
> They are sometimes referred to as "load and store" computers because
> of their instruction's relative (to cisc) simplicity.

  On some CISC architectures, there are single complex instructions
that will change the contents of a specified memory location in
specified ways.  On RISC CPUs, this almost always corresponds to at
least 3 instructions:

   LOAD (mem location -> register)
   <modify value in register>
   STORE (register -> mem location)

A CISC machine often has some kinds of value modification that can be
done without the separate LOAD and STORE instructions.
  And the use of a register.  Because of this consideration, RISC CPUs
tend to provide many more general-purpose registers than CISC CPUs do.


David G

                         PCBUILD's List Owner's:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                        Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2