PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - PC Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 May 1998 13:37:17 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
On 14 May 98 at 7:02, Russ Poffenberger wrote:

> Putting a narrow device on a wide bus does NOT slow down the other
> peripherals. This is a common misconception.
>
> Thje SCSI controller will negotiate the transfer rate individually
> with each device.

  Every nice simple rule has its exception, it seems.  If you connect
a narrow device to a wide bus between the controller and a wide
device, with a wide-narrow adapter that terminates the wide aprt of
the bus, then you only have a narrow data path available from the
controller to the wide device.  [This is not the scenario that Russ
was responding to, and its fix involves rearranging devices rather
than installing a second host adapter.]



  There should probably be a SCSI FAQ around somewhere.  Try

  http://www.storagedimensions.com/support/faq/faqscsi.html

or

  http://www.lib.ox.ac.uk/internet/news/faq/archive/scsi-faq.part1.html
and
  http://www.lib.ox.ac.uk/internet/news/faq/archive/scsi-faq.part2.html

and only then should you (carefully) proceed to

  http://www.progress.demon.co.uk/Fun/scsi-faq.html

which is of largely historical entertainment value.

David G

ATOM RSS1 RSS2